Recommended Posts

Posted
3 hours ago, SigmundChurchill said:

DD0D61FC-6C42-48BD-A8FD-86153FD3FD19.jpeg.b436189dbfcc55c567c486a2e54c8290.jpeg

7F2752F5-BA8E-4ECE-BE96-30EB9B5CC583.jpeg.80fc02418b9bef82c5ebcb7b9356b059.jpeg

How were they ? 

  • Replies 96.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • LLC

    1973

  • Raskol

    1946

  • Lotusguy

    1775

  • SigmundChurchill

    1691

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

An RE Friday with @Nate Chu C&C for a Saturday morning with this Sir Winston from 03. Today is going to be great if this cigar is anything to judge it by. What a super smooth star

First cigar of the year.

Siglo VI MAY 11 RyJ Churchill Media Luna Esplendido

Posted
1 hour ago, teamrandr said:

Pilot?

No not a pilot. Engineering 

  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, sw15825 said:

How were they ? 

The CoRo was excellent.  Tastes like it has some age on it, there is no box code on these, so I don’t know for sure how much, but I would say maybe 5 years or so.  The San Cristobal still tastes very young, but good.  I see a lot of potential there.

  • Like 4
Posted
6 hours ago, Ry27 said:

Trinidad Fundy: BLAH. Also from the xmas sampler and one of the ugliest wrappers I’ve seen on a cigar. Very dry tannic experience, only a couple decent puffs. Letdown

H Upman Sir Winston: very solid, I could smoke these every day

 

funny, you could swap the description on these two cigars and describe my experience exactly.

-dobbs

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Community Software by Invision Power Services, Inc.