Recommended Posts

  • Replies 96.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • LLC

    1973

  • Raskol

    1947

  • Lotusguy

    1775

  • SigmundChurchill

    1695

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

An RE Friday with @Nate Chu C&C for a Saturday morning with this Sir Winston from 03. Today is going to be great if this cigar is anything to judge it by. What a super smooth star

First cigar of the year.

Siglo VI MAY 11 RyJ Churchill Media Luna Esplendido

Posted

@Lrabold89

The 2017 Vigia was smooth. No signs of young cigar like the previous ones I smoke early this year. Flavors are good. Looking forward to the next one, probably a few months time.

Cheers!

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, inter4alia said:

 my new personalized cigar rest courtesy of @BeerPimp.  

 

Very cool cigar rest !!!

  • Thanks 1
Posted
3 hours ago, JohnS said:

If there was a poll conducted to seek out the most under-rated Montecristo cigar I wonder if the Montecristo No.1 would top it. I would think the top prize would go to the often neglected and unheralded coronas-sized Montecristo No.3, but I would hasten to add that the Lonsdale-sized Montecristo No.1 wouldn't be too far behind.

It's tough from a value perspective. A number 1 costs almost as much as a number 2 with almost 30% less weight. Number 3 costs more than the length increase over number 4 would suggest, at that point you might as well pay the bit more and get a number 2 or 1 (so you're probably right number 3 is the most overlooked for this reason). Of course there's also the issue that tons of number 4 are produced and the question of whether or not quality can be maintained...

The calculus may be different in Australia since you are taxed by weight, so the 1 is probably considerably cheaper than the 2, and so on.

  • Like 1
Posted
26 minutes ago, Bijan said:

It's tough from a value perspective. A number 1 costs almost as much as a number 2 with almost 30% less weight. Number 3 costs more than the length increase over number 4 would suggest, at that point you might as well pay the bit more and get a number 2 or 1 (so you're probably right number 3 is the most overlooked for this reason). Of course there's also the issue that tons of number 4 are produced and the question of whether or not quality can be maintained...

Yes, well said! ?

27 minutes ago, Bijan said:

The calculus may be different in Australia since you are taxed by weight, so the 1 is probably considerably cheaper than the 2, and so on.

For the Australian market that's correct.

Posted
15 hours ago, Happy2BeHere said:

A beautiful place to catch no fish today!

cigar in one hand, flyrod in the other, no fish. Sounds alot like my weekend too! ??

  • Like 1
Posted
3 hours ago, awk6898 said:

Afternoon coffee break. PLPC, LEP-NOV-16

How have these evolved so far?  I have a LEP DEC-16 box that I have not touched yet.

  • Like 1
Posted
How have these evolved so far?  I have a LEP DEC-16 box that I have not touched yet.
I'd say crack into them and give one or two a shot. I've had maybe 8 from this box and they're all smoking well. They haven't entirely smoothed out yet, but the 'caramel' that everyone talks about is slowly coming out.


Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
19 hours ago, Happy2BeHere said:

Took this very nice Rafael Gonzalez PC with me to flyfish a NorCal bay

01B2C57A-1DD7-43B1-A908-B2557016217D.jpeg

5D65F799-D1A9-4264-806E-8229BCBB6BF9.jpeg

Looks like Tomales Bay! 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Community Software by Invision Power Services, Inc.