Blind Review #2 2022 (BRWJAN23)

[Tunkat92]

I had a rare 3 day weekend, so I took this opportunity to have a rare two cigar weekend. 
Prelighting, the wrapper has a milk chocolate, slight barn yard aroma. Cold draw, milk chocolate

Initial lighting, I get a citrus note mostly over taken by a medium white pepper retro. By the end of the 1/3 the initial flavor mellow and balance, while milk chocolate and cream start to show up

At the start of the 2/3. The stick just goes out. Seems to be a stubborn piece of tobacco that will not light. After a long torching it finally goes and tastes sour.

the 3/3 was plagued with the same construction issue. I chocked it up to maybe a bad leaf. When it was burning and didn’t taste bitter. I got milk chocolate and a slight lemon taste. At the nub, the burn is nice again and I get a nice chocolate flavor, mixed with coffee.

 

 

[Jackdani7401]

Sancho Panza Belicoso 

[jakebarnes]

Monte 2. But construction issues would have led me to VR Unicos

[Chibearsv]

16 minutes ago, jakebarnes said:

Monte 2. But construction issues would have led me to VR Unicos

Agree, sounds like Monte 2 but I've never had a construction issue with a Monte 2 as described.

[david9985]

Upmann 2

[joeypots]

MC#2

[cigaraholic]

MC#2

[btort910]

Monte 2

[Chucko8]

Monte 2

[rcarlson]

Unicos

[karp]

I’m guessing Monte2 also..

[Edicion]

Sounds like an off Mon 2 and therefore it's a Diplomáticos #2...

[gormag38]

I'm going to go with a Monte 2. Mass production (supposedly) can lead to some poor construction. 

[Tunkat92]

This ones a Monte no 2

[Rhinoww]

Monte 2. Sorry for the issues. That kinda sucks.