El Presidente Posted September 16, 2021 Posted September 16, 2021 99cal wrote the following on the Aging VR thread. I think the FOH team and members hit the nail on the head with all those, Tiramisu, prune, milk chocolate, high quality lush earthy grassy flavours, but I do think VR is one of those marcas that if age even slightly on the dry side, do become papery and spent. Like a few have already mentioned, I've also had my fair share, of lifeless/dead Classicos, and Familiares. Although these are cigars I hadn't aged myself, and had probably changed hands a few times/done lots of air travel, etc etc. Like any cigar I think they can be magic aged, but I do think like Sanchos they are easy to ruin, and why I think harsh reviews are sometimes received. It was welll written and it had me thinking The question is not necessarilly about aging but storage and RH. Have you found there are certain cigars that just benefit from a higher RH? Would you consider running 60% 65% and 70% desktop tupperdores controlled by Bovedas? Which cigars do you believe benefit by a higher RH? I have a couple that I believe do. Would love your thoughts.
NSXCIGAR Posted September 16, 2021 Posted September 16, 2021 Hadn't thought about it but I never seem to have to drybox VR, SC or Trini. Always seem to have to drybox Monte, Boli, LGC, PL and RA. 1
99call Posted September 16, 2021 Posted September 16, 2021 Cuaba Distinguidos, VR, Fonseca no 1, Sanchos, light wrappered Dips, ERDM CS In a general sense, anything that is mid to mild strength, and has subtle package of nuanced flavours, that if smoked a little dry can be lost. Fonseca No 1 is a fine example to me. If a touch on the humid side, can taste like a poor mans Des Dieux i.e the vanilla and florals are slightly elevated, if too dry can taste papery and tannic. 1
BrightonCorgi Posted September 16, 2021 Posted September 16, 2021 I don't think it is a particular cigar issue, but more of the state of the cigar. 20+ year old cigars are generally able to carry on with a little more humidity than a current box code. 3
potpest Posted September 16, 2021 Posted September 16, 2021 Purely anecdotal but last summer I had some Sir Winnies in a humidity bag from a shop in Switzerland I hadn't removed yet, had been there around 6 months. They felt a bit soft but I fancied one, tremendous smoke and perfect burn, out of curiosity I stuck a hygrometer in and discovered they were sitting at 81%. I took them out of there as was worried about mould but got me wondering.Would be an interesting one for a video, smoking at higher than normal humidity. I think Lawrence Davis who owns Sauters in London tends to keep his smokes around 80% and swears by it.
Popular Post smbauerllc Posted September 16, 2021 Popular Post Posted September 16, 2021 Dont really have any specific Cigars that I have noticed, so cant help with that question, but I believe that my Cigars smoke much better since I moved up from 62% to 65% Bovedas about a year ago. At 62% i was having lots of issues with wrappers cracking while in my tupperdors, from normal handling and while smoking, plus the smoke got hotter quicker, when getting down to the last third. Have had none of these issues, with rare exceptions obviously, since increasing rh, and they also seem a bit stronger and more flavorful, so I keep everything at 65% and don't dry box, and they seem perfect to me. That said, I don't intentionally age any of my smokes, as I haven't been overly impressed with my experience with Cigars aged much past 5 years, and find current production to be just fine for me. I don't recall where, but I do think that I read somewhere that smokes age better and faster at a higher rh than at a lower one. If I'm incorrectly remembering, someone more knowledgeable with aging please correct me. Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk 7
ReturnFreeRisk Posted September 16, 2021 Posted September 16, 2021 PLPC and PLMC smoke better for me when I let them sit for a couple weeks in a 69 boveda ziplock. Flavors are stronger and deeper. PLMC pulled from my typical 62 bin is also the go to when its 75+ humidity outside as it always performs beautifully in high humidity Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk 2
smbauerllc Posted September 16, 2021 Posted September 16, 2021 PLPC and PLMC smoke better for me when I let them sit for a couple weeks in a 69 boveda ziplock. Flavors are stronger and deeper. PLMC pulled from my typical 62 bin is also the go to when its 75+ humidity outside as it always performs beautifully in high humidity Sent from my iPad using TapatalkInteresting.69% seems pretty high, and would expect them to have burn issues, wanting to go out unless constantly puffing, and possibly being a little bit bitter based on my experience with high rh Cigars rott from most vendors. That's why I try to let everything rest and acclimate to my rh for a month or so. Have occasionally broken that rule and smoked a fair number pretty much rott, and occasionally have the issues described. Also find the experience of those in high humidity climates stateing that they smoke differently in the high outdoor humidity. I would think that they wouldn't have a long enough exposure time for the rh of the Cigar to change any, but it seems to be the case with most people in high humidity climates. The outside th here in Wyoming is rarely above 50%, and commonly closer to 20% or so since we are a high desert and get very little precipitation Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
Bri Fi Posted September 16, 2021 Posted September 16, 2021 Fonseca 1 is the most obvious to me that smokes better at a higher RH. I’m starting to think montecristo smokes better as well. I do believe those marca that tend to have sweeter notes will smoke better when stored at a higher rh. Overall I have moved my storage from 62% to 65% the past year because my smokes were becoming flavorless and tannic. That said, I don’t have a temp controlled unit so my storage is very inconsistent throughout the seasons. Five years in and I still haven’t figured it out. Trial and error. 2
Bijan Posted September 16, 2021 Posted September 16, 2021 2 hours ago, smbauerllc said: I would think that they wouldn't have a long enough exposure time for the rh of the Cigar to change any, but it seems to be the case with most people in high humidity climates. Maybe not from just sitting outside. But smoking seems to have a much faster effect. Generally at warmer temperatures though.
smbauerllc Posted September 16, 2021 Posted September 16, 2021 Maybe not from just sitting outside. But smoking seems to have a much faster effect. Generally at warmer temperatures though.Very interesting. Very glad to have relatively low humidity and more moderate temperatures hereSent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
Kaptain Karl Posted September 16, 2021 Posted September 16, 2021 3 hours ago, Bri Fi said: Fonseca 1 is the most obvious to me that smokes better at a higher RH. I’m starting to think montecristo smokes better as well. I do believe those marca that tend to have sweeter notes will smoke better when stored at a higher rh. Overall I have moved my storage from 62% to 65% the past year because my smokes were becoming flavorless and tannic. That said, I don’t have a temp controlled unit so my storage is very inconsistent throughout the seasons. Five years in and I still haven’t figured it out. Trial and error. Interesting I had way better luck with dry boxing my montecristo’s.
99call Posted September 16, 2021 Posted September 16, 2021 10 hours ago, El Presidente said: I have a couple that I believe do Be interested to hear your selection Rob 9 hours ago, potpest said: I think Lawrence Davis who owns Sauters in London tends to keep his smokes around 80% and swears by it. I think it's important to bear in mind, he's a self confessed and avid chewer of cigars. If he ran his cigars at 65% or lower, they would most likely fall to bits in his mouth. 1 1
NSXCIGAR Posted September 16, 2021 Posted September 16, 2021 6 hours ago, smbauerllc said: I would think that they wouldn't have a long enough exposure time for the rh of the Cigar to change any, but it seems to be the case with most people in high humidity climates. In my experience, particularly at night when rH rises and dew begins to form cigars can change very rapidly and just soak up moisture. Of course, rH at that point is well above 90%. I had some Monte 1s recently that I could not smoke at night because of it. They just started wicking up the moisture after only about 20 minutes of smoking. I've found that as long as outdoor rH is below 80-85% I can get through most cigars with no issues. A Churchill or DC might be an issue I suppose but I don't smoke many of those. 2
El Presidente Posted September 16, 2021 Author Posted September 16, 2021 Bolivar Royal Corona, Cohiba Maduro 5 Magicos/Genios+ Partagas Maduro lines, SC Punta and Fuerza. I have been smoking a lot of 20/21 BRC and I certainly prefer them at closer to 70 than 63. The cocoa notes are simply enhanced....and they have been cocoa laden. I have been experimenting with others and some of those "sweeter" treats certainly sing more for me at the higher RH level. I have had plenty of fails. Regio/Monte 2/D4/BBF still experimenting. 3
99call Posted September 16, 2021 Posted September 16, 2021 7 minutes ago, El Presidente said: still experimenting. good life mantra 1
Popular Post PigFish Posted September 17, 2021 Popular Post Posted September 17, 2021 I don't have enough life left in me to prove a theory like this. Let me know when the Cubans are barcoding tobacco earmarked to be stored 'wetter' and tracing them back to specific brands and boxes! You guys do come up with the damnedest things... -LOL How many cigars do you need to store and smoke and for what period do you have to store them at that level to be sure of your findings to come to a conclusion like this? I am curious! I fully agree that water content changes the taste of a cigar... but on a brand basis...! Really!!! Does alcohol consumption have anything to do with this theory??? 🤪 (read with levity) -the Pig 5 2
Glass Half Full Posted September 17, 2021 Posted September 17, 2021 I try to take notes on my "cigar list" (age, box code, etc.) of possible "Best RH." ...That is, the RH that I'd shoot for next time (assuming I planned ahead, which is a big assumption ...after experiencing a cigar that somehow was less than expected (too tight, too loose, and/or the flavors off), suggesting a pre-light RH adjustment for next time. Experimenting is the word, and we are lucky to have the opportunity to do so (and learn from it and others) thanks to FOH VR Unicos (which can be incredibly good IMO) always seemed to me to benefit from a little more RH. To me, they seem a bit loosely rolled when they're <63% but can provide a much better experience, and all kinds of flavor @ 65%. Another 2 more cents.
Glass Half Full Posted September 17, 2021 Posted September 17, 2021 14 minutes ago, PigFish said: I don't have enough life left in me to prove a theory like this. Let me know when the Cubans are barcoding tobacco earmarked to be stored 'wetter' and tracing them back to specific brands and boxes! You guys do come up with the damnedest things... -LOL How many cigars do you need to store and smoke and for what period do you have to store them at that level to be sure of your findings to come to a conclusion like this? I am curious! I fully agree that water content changes the taste of a cigar... but on a brand basis...! Really!!! Does alcohol consumption have anything to do with this theory??? 🤪 (read with levity) -the Pig Pig, I have great appreciation for what can be learned from your many helpful posts. ...But this one, I have to respectfully disagree with. The question was asking subjective opinions (mine surely are). IMO, different brands, blends and sizes can influence each of our enjoyment of a given cigar at a given RH levels (no doubt you'll highlight temperature too -- as temperature and RH go hand in hand, as I've learned from your presentations Nothing scientific to back up this subjective opinion. It just seems that some cigars taste better at one RH than another. No big deal. Just an opinion. Thanks for your many excellent posts ...that is before this last one
PigFish Posted September 17, 2021 Posted September 17, 2021 Along with proper rH and temperature, sometimes good taste demands you poke the bear!!! 🐷
Popular Post 99call Posted September 17, 2021 Popular Post Posted September 17, 2021 6 hours ago, PigFish said: but on a brand basis...! Really!!! Blind tastings have proved over and over again, that when that band is removed a BRC, D4, and JL2 can quite often become an incestuous minefield, and most 'afficionados' end up looking very silly indeed. I hear what you're saying Ray, and they're all valid comments to some degree. I'm of the opinion that two things can be true at the same time, yes the make up of any two cigars in a box is divisible across so my processes and factors that an argument to suggest marca terroir, can seem a stretch. But I also believe that for all their faults, construction etc it's still a very fine product, that the intent to blend to a specific outcomes is there. I know it can often be amusing/frustrating (depending on how you want to see it) to take pot shots as HSA, and suggest it's some sort of randomised sausage machine thats out of control, and yes when you see boxes without bands, empty boxes etc etc, it's very easy to mock. I see it a slightly different way, which is for people that are paid so little, and work so hard, it's actually pretty astounding that they care so much to produce what is still a fantastic product. God forbid production was moved to the UK, (under the same terms of employment) then you really would see a terrible product, maybe even a dirty protest. I go on the simple rule of thumb, that my most recent box of Punch Punch, tastes much more like my box of 2015 Punch Punch, than it does my 2015 box of JL1, and so on and so forth. With the current production of Cuban cigars, I think the truth lies somewhere between, It's a free for all shit show, and it's an artisan product made by highly skilled people that still seem to care, when few of us would. It's easy to bang on about the shit show theory, but sometimes I think it's important to give people a bit of credit and praise them for what they get right. I'm smoking from a recent box of Regios, and they wonderfully well made, consistent in flavour across the box, all exactly the same shade, the box is nicely presented etc etc now if this box had MADE IN GERMANY stamped in the bottom, I dare say there would be people waxing lyrical about German efficiency, quality control etc etc. I just think it's important sometimes give credit where credit is due, and understand that there must be some method in the madness. As for certain cigars tasting better wetter, it's just a opinion based on multiple bad experiences after dry boxing. and subconciously realising there were specific cigars/ brands that I was choosing not to dry box. 5
MrBirdman Posted September 17, 2021 Posted September 17, 2021 On 9/16/2021 at 8:35 AM, potpest said: I think Lawrence Davis who owns Sauters in London tends to keep his smokes around 80% and swears by it. If you watch how rapidly he smokes in his videos, that makes sense.
Enduin Posted September 18, 2021 Posted September 18, 2021 Between this conversation and the dipping in water experiment, I wonder if it's not as simple as higher/lower RH in the cigars, but rather higher/lower moisture content in different parts of the cigars. Specifically, what if the best result can be achieved by having a drier inner section of the cigar (which could help with burning) with a wetter outer section (which could help the flavor)? I personally never found dry boxed cigars to be exceptional. It certainly helped making some plugged cigars smokable, but the flavor profile was always a bit underwhelming. So, across the board lower RH has not worked very well for me. Similarly, I'm finding that smoking outside in the summer (with high humidity) never delivers memorable experiences. Halfway through the cigar the draw become tighter and I have to puff faster to keep the cigar alive. 2
Bagman Posted September 18, 2021 Posted September 18, 2021 God we over think this hobby sometimes! 2 1
SCgarman Posted September 18, 2021 Posted September 18, 2021 3 hours ago, Enduin said: Between this conversation and the dipping in water experiment, I wonder if it's not as simple as higher/lower RH in the cigars, but rather higher/lower moisture content in different parts of the cigars. Specifically, what if the best result can be achieved by having a drier inner section of the cigar (which could help with burning) with a wetter outer section (which could help the flavor)? I personally never found dry boxed cigars to be exceptional. It certainly helped making some plugged cigars smokable, but the flavor profile was always a bit underwhelming. So, across the board lower RH has not worked very well for me. Similarly, I'm finding that smoking outside in the summer (with high humidity) never delivers memorable experiences. Halfway through the cigar the draw become tighter and I have to puff faster to keep the cigar alive. High humidity summer weather is the worst for cigars. Cuban tobacco literally soaks up the moisture and taste/burn go downhill real quick. For myself usually before the halfway point. Very much look forward to the drier air of fall. 3
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now