El Presidente Posted June 12, 2009 Posted June 12, 2009 Van had the great idea of doing a blind lancero tasting to see if we could determine Cuban from non Cuban. Van selected the cigars, removed the bands and then shipped them to us. They rested close to 8 weeks in the humidor. 9 cigars in total .....three each of "A" "B" "C" We completed the video Thursday and contacted Van with our answers. Thank you so much Van!!!! It was a hell of a lot of fun
Tampa1257 Posted June 12, 2009 Posted June 12, 2009 I look forward to viewing the video review tonight when I get home, Van included me in this blind Lancero review and I have been waiting for those down under to be able to complete to chime in. I will say that IMHO it was quite easy to determine which one was non-Cuban.
cigarros Posted June 12, 2009 Posted June 12, 2009 THX guys for video! Excellent analysis! You have visually proved that Cuba - always remains Cuba! Deeds, not words
Ken Gargett Posted June 12, 2009 Posted June 12, 2009 van, many thanks for a wonderfully interesting exercise. must say i am stunned by the 12 year old monte. never came close to that. and no thanks to rob for stuffing up the smithy sting. and guys, am i correct in thinking that don pepin is nic? do i win a prize? in truth, could not have been more of a stab in the dark. but all up, great fun.
aavkk Posted June 12, 2009 Posted June 12, 2009 great review guys and thanks for setting it up Van. I just picked up some 01 Lanceros and I am glad that I did.
lutharthegreat Posted June 13, 2009 Posted June 13, 2009 Always look forward to the video reviews. Thanks
Jimmy2 Posted June 13, 2009 Posted June 13, 2009 These tastings are not as easy as some of you think you really need to be born with a very good palete.. But there are others ways to tell to cap use to be one way but non Cubans now have them ,Wrapper or like Rob said the bunch of the tobacco. But it all comes down to the taste for the most part well the after taste at least for me. Good job guys..
Guest rob Posted June 13, 2009 Posted June 13, 2009 Good idea and execution, Van. Well reviewed boys.. I enjoyed the flow of comments and analysis.
gwags Posted June 13, 2009 Posted June 13, 2009 Another Great review Gents! What I would like to see is a true BLIND taste test, blindfolded. Remove at least one sense - the eyes. Not seeing the wrapper, conical burn, and ash would make it interesting. If nothing else it'd be a great video to watch.
Ken Gargett Posted June 13, 2009 Posted June 13, 2009 Another Great review Gents! What I would like to see is a true BLIND taste test, blindfolded. Remove at least one sense - the eyes. Not seeing the wrapper, conical burn, and ash would make it interesting. If nothing else it'd be a great video to watch. good idea in theory but if you blindfold smithy, he is likely to end up with the cigar up his nose.
jadawin Posted June 13, 2009 Posted June 13, 2009 Nice reviews! The review on the Monte surprised me, as well as how much the Pepin lancero sucked! I havent had the blue label lancero, but ive had a few of the other Lanceros Pepin blends and have loved them.
Ken Gargett Posted June 13, 2009 Posted June 13, 2009 I look forward to viewing the video review tonight when I get home, Van included me in this blind Lancero review and I have been waiting for those down under to be able to complete to chime in.I will say that IMHO it was quite easy to determine which one was non-Cuban. tampa, how did you go? i'll be impressed if you nailed the monte.
Guest rob Posted June 13, 2009 Posted June 13, 2009 The Monte analysis reminds me of the Monte 4's from '98 that I brought up to Brisbane to share with Prez and Smithy. They were lifeless, uninspiring and well past their use-by-date. (I'm talking about the cigars btw )
Van55 Posted June 13, 2009 Posted June 13, 2009 The tasting video was more than worth the cigars I supplied. I knew that identifying the non-Cuban as such would be easy. Mis-identifying the old Monte as a young Vegaros is surprising. I've had old Especiales that are fantastic, but it seems that box is past its prime. By the way the Pepin Blue Label was Cigar Aficionado's #8 Cigar of 2008. The two that I have tried were much better on my palate than you guys found them to be. Sorry about that. The Cohibas were from the infamous 2001 batch that had so many over-tight examples. These were reinspected in Germany by Cuban inspectors and were supposed to have no such draw issues. Glad you had fun guys. I did too.
PigFish Posted June 13, 2009 Posted June 13, 2009 ...what was the quote, "bloody horrible?" That was ******* priceless! Cheers Mates! -Piggy
PigFish Posted June 13, 2009 Posted June 13, 2009 I have smoked many a CLE 01 Lanceros. They do seem to pattern as mild with a formidable draw in the beginning. About mid stream they really begin to open up and the final third is generally where there abundant but arguably monotonic flavor can be rated as uniquely classic Cohiba. They almost always start uneventful but as your palate acclimatizes the cigars' uniquely Cuban progressive construction makes this an all time favorite cigar. ****... I think I a gonna go grab me one!
lordlister Posted June 13, 2009 Posted June 13, 2009 I'd be interested to know which release of the blue label lancero was reviewed. The special release lancero's from Al are out of this world. I agree that regular production leaves something to be desired.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now