dangolf18 Posted December 19, 2015 Posted December 19, 2015 That 20 should be a 15 and it's impossible to know what the ? number is.
Jeremy Festa Posted December 19, 2015 Posted December 19, 2015 That 20 should be a 15 and it's impossible to know what the ? number is. Nothing is impossible Sent from my iPhone
Alien13 Posted December 19, 2015 Posted December 19, 2015 That 20 should be a 15 and it's impossible to know what the ? number is. *SPOILER* The 5 = 20 is correct. It's simply x = x * x - x 5 = 5 * 5 - 5 5 = 25 - 5 5 = 20 So with that in mind. 3 = 6
dangolf18 Posted December 19, 2015 Posted December 19, 2015 *SPOILER* The 5 = 20 is correct. It's simply x = x * x - x 5 = 5 * 5 - 5 5 = 25 - 5 5 = 20 So with that in mind. 3 = 6 Oh duh I see it now. I saw the pattern but was wondering why the 4 wasn't there. Definitely 6.Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
garbandz Posted December 19, 2015 Posted December 19, 2015 "That 20 should be a 15 and it's impossible to know what the ? number is." or this if you missed the pattern completely..............
Optic101 Posted December 19, 2015 Author Posted December 19, 2015 Well done guys. X * (X-1) ? = 6 Or the "manual" way 8 = 56 > 7 7 = 42 > 6 6 = 30 > 5 5 = 20 > 4 3 = > 2 3 x 2 = 6
Jeremy Festa Posted December 19, 2015 Posted December 19, 2015 ****! Trick question! Solved it as if it was 4! Sent from my iPhone
Perla Posted December 19, 2015 Posted December 19, 2015 Well done guys. X * (X-1) ? = 6 Or the "manual" way 8 = 56 > 7 7 = 42 > 6 6 = 30 > 5 5 = 20 > 4 3 = > 2 3 x 2 = 6 Are you sure? It also could be: 8= 56 -14 7= 42 -12 6= 30 -10 5= 20 -8 3= 12 1
shlomo Posted December 19, 2015 Posted December 19, 2015 Are you sure? It also could be: 8= 56 -14 7= 42 -12 6= 30 -10 5= 20 -8 3= 12 Great!
ayepatz Posted December 19, 2015 Posted December 19, 2015 Yes. I understand none of this. I shall have a cigar instead. 1
Optic101 Posted December 20, 2015 Author Posted December 20, 2015 Are you sure? It also could be: 8= 56 -14 7= 42 -12 6= 30 -10 5= 20 -8 3= 12 Very good point. 8= 56 14 7= 42 12 6= 30 10 5= 20 8 3= 12 What does not work with this approach is that there is an asynchrony step on the left side (5 to 3) while the right side is fully synchron. IMHO 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now