Recommended Posts

Posted

 

Your best cigar experience of March 2024? :cigar:

That cigar over the past 30 days that you can still taste/remember. The cigar experience that keeps you going back for more :spotlight:

Posted
3 hours ago, Smokers_Cough said:

Montecristo No.1 from '20 I believe and I don't seem to have taken a picture. It was classic Monte though and reminded me why I enjoy them. It was my first and I have to say I really enjoyed the format, and plan on picking up a box soon. 

I have smoked a few 1s from 2020 and they were excellent. 

  • Like 3
Posted

@hrs1 how has your MSA OCT 17' box been so far? I have that same code and last example was about 15-18 months ago and was, well, less than ideal. Zero cherry, zero baked goods, zero of any typical RyJ flavor profile, just a mild tobacco note. I've been pulling out of my OCT 21' tubos box that has been phenomenal. I've been on the fence about trying another from the 17' box but that last one was just terrible.

  • Like 1
Posted

@Lt4-396 - It's been a good box. Smoked 13 so far. 1 complete dud (under-filled). Another was overfilled with a massive stem, but perfect draw & some pliers did the trick. The majority have been solid ~93pt smokes, which I usually ding for not being rich enough or uneven burns/relights. Last month's smoke and another broke into 95pt+ territory.

I've also been smoking out of a UEB OCT 17 box, which has been stellar (see a review here). I've heard from others who've had a similar experience and others who had construction problems. Not sure what your experience has been with the rest of your box, but perhaps your last smoke was a dud? Feel like people note that the Churchill had a comeback sometime in the late 2010s, so I hope that's the case :)

I have some tubos from TPL JUN 20 as well that I've loved (see a review here). My notes on these typically read something like, "The flavor is richer than examples from some 2017 dress boxes I’ve been smoking. The smoke is a little less silky, but that’s a trade I’m willing to make." So, I can see what you're saying about the '17s vs '21s. Could be the impact of aging or that the quality has continually gotten better since '17...I'm hoping for the latter. :) 

Happy smoking! 🥂 

  • Like 2
Posted

March: H Upman Connossieur B, UBM JUL 18, a little too fat for me but flavor and construction were flawless.

February: MC#4, REG MAY 18,  5 stars. 

 

  • Like 4

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Community Software by Invision Power Services, Inc.