Recommended Posts

Posted

While in Mexico this past December, I brought along a dozen plus cigars. I decided to review two in a different way. I would smoke and illustrate what I was seeing and tasting. The result is a mixed media review using drawing pencils, water colour paint and the original bands

I hope you enjoy it.

rolleyes.gif Please note. Title says RE, should be LE. Can't change it. post-6763-0-81945200-1329606551.jpg

Posted

Thanks for the feedback folks. Don't get too focused on the 82 score. Dozens of other people here swear by them. I was just expecting more. I have a few more singles. Hopefully I'll see what the other are getting. :)

Posted

LOVE the review Frank, a new twist on cigar reviews, I love it.

Posted

Loved the two reviews you did, point for point pretty much exactly my experience too, even after approaching with not big expectations. I have two more RAE sitting that I'll try in a few months time but I'm not overly bothered. the 1966 I had may have just been a bad stick but at that price there is no excuse for having a bad stick :(

Hope to see more reviews in this style!

Posted

Very cool way of doing the review, Frank. Very unique and eye catching; asthetically pleasing.

I agree with others on the 82 score, and I also agree with your statements on it - just give it more chances. This seems to be a heck of a fine cigar!

Cheers and well done! :thumbsup::perfect10:

Posted

I had one last evening. It was a very good smoke in terms of flavor, strength snd evolution but had repeated burn issues requiring touch ups. I'm not in the habit of scoring my smokes but my forthcoming review will reveal it was very enjoyable.

Posted

Oh and really nice artistic expression.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Completely agree with your review. I immediately received the chocolate bouquet opening the box, but was less than impressed with the flavors I received. Was harsh, obviously young. Hoping, like the rest of us with poor experiences, that these will age magnificently. I'm putting them to bed for a year.

Posted

Thank you for the review. I'm halfway through a box. Mine have been mainly 92-93. Too young, but clearly excellent for a LE. Love the size.

Posted

Not sure why I didn't see this earlier. That's pretty cool stuff, Frank. I'd say the review was better than the cigar being reviewed :rotfl:

Posted

Big fan of mixed media art. Good idea! Hope to see more. Sorry about the uneventful cigar.

Posted

I had my second RAE yesterday. It was a far better experience the second time around. About four months have passed since I lit up the one that is in this review.

Highlights:

Excellent development over every third. This example had far more character.

Sweet and savoury notes trading off each other with every few puffs. A few bitter notes here and there but not unpleasant.

Caramel notes, cedar, nougat, honey, toasty tobacco, and a very refreshing sourdough hit to open up the first third.

One of two things have happened.

Either the first one I had was a dud. Or this cigar improved over time. I'm now thinking that I should be smoking at least two cigars from any new box I pick up to assess the quality and readiness of the contents within.

And for the record. I score this second RAE a 92.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Community Software by Invision Power Services, Inc.