First Lady Posted February 24, 2005 Posted February 24, 2005 Hi Guys Okay I received the first shipment of the H Upmann Monarchs but before everyone gets excited the first lot have already been allocated to those who contacted me or have been on the waiting list for awhile. I will let you know when we are to receive another shipment but if you wish to be on the backorder list please e-mail me on [email protected] Are they Tang? - Yes they are! TFL
99call Posted December 4, 2018 Posted December 4, 2018 Whatever I was doing in 2005, it was the wrong thing. As I wasn't replying to this!!! Goddamnit!! 1 1
99call Posted December 4, 2018 Posted December 4, 2018 13 minutes ago, thedame007 said: In my defence i was 16! Still no defence. Those fresh lungs were primed and ready 1
cfc1016 Posted December 4, 2018 Posted December 4, 2018 AFAIK the sir Winston is the same blend. It would seem, effectively, the monarcas were simply rebranded. I think @JohnS was the one who told me this. Whaddoiknow, though? HUs have never been my cuppa tea ?♂️
El Presidente Posted December 4, 2018 Posted December 4, 2018 2 minutes ago, cfc1016 said: AFAIK the sir Winston is the same blend. I Very different blend. 1
cfc1016 Posted December 4, 2018 Posted December 4, 2018 2 hours ago, El Presidente said: Very different blend. ? Clearly my narrow scope of experience with HU makes me the wrong guy to ask, lol. I’m better off sticking to my partagas ?
BrightonCorgi Posted December 4, 2018 Posted December 4, 2018 4 hours ago, cfc1016 said: AFAIK the sir Winston is the same blend. It would seem, effectively, the monarcas were simply rebranded. Hardly the same blend... Monarchs were my main cigar for until they dried up.
MooseAMuffin Posted December 4, 2018 Posted December 4, 2018 How different were the Tang Monarch and the H Upmann Monarcas? There was a post that Rob put up earlier in the year asking what cigar you'd bring back. I've never had one but read how much everyone enjoyed the Tang Monarch so I chose that. I figured the closest cigar to it would be the regular production Monarcas and I was lucky enough to pick one up in a recent box pass! Saving it for a special occasion.
Gamehawker Posted December 4, 2018 Posted December 4, 2018 I am glad and lucky to get a box of H.Upmann Monarch A/T "GTL MAY 07". I have not smoked one yet but plan on soon. Also, I still have five left from a box of H.Upmann Monarch A/T from 1998 "JM OCSU" that I am saving for a very special occasion, i.e., my daughter's wedding or first grandchild if I am lucky enough to still be alive then.
cfc1016 Posted December 4, 2018 Posted December 4, 2018 1 hour ago, BrightonCorgi said: Hardly the same blend... Monarchs were my main cigar for until they dried up. Just found where i read it. It was for the *monarcas* - not the *monarchs* - both julieta no. 2 vitolas, no less ?Thanks for manufacturing the need for disambiguation, HSA ? From a prominent review site: “H. Upmann Monarcas Review: Same taste as H. Upmann Sir Winston. This is a cigar of exceptional quality. As it is from H. Upmann, the tobacco taste is strong and the materials used are first class. That strong tobacco taste is greatly balanced with herbal flavours. As time passes by, this cigar gets better and better.”
BrightonCorgi Posted December 4, 2018 Posted December 4, 2018 24 minutes ago, cfc1016 said: Just found where i read it. It was for the *monarcas* - not the *monarchs* - both julieta no. 2 vitolas, no less ?Thanks for manufacturing the need for disambiguation, HSA ? From a prominent review site: “H. Upmann Monarcas Review: Same taste as H. Upmann Sir Winston. This is a cigar of exceptional quality. As it is from H. Upmann, the tobacco taste is strong and the materials used are first class. That strong tobacco taste is greatly balanced with herbal flavours. As time passes by, this cigar gets better and better.” I thought Monarcas were the tubos and Monarchs (both Upmann) were dress boxes? Same cigar.
Wilzc Posted December 4, 2018 Posted December 4, 2018 Wow.. necromancy!! And here I was getting confuddled and sexcited...
cfc1016 Posted December 4, 2018 Posted December 4, 2018 1 hour ago, BrightonCorgi said: I thought Monarcas were the tubos and Monarchs (both Upmann) were dress boxes? Same cigar. I’m certain of even less now, than I was before ? Speaking of long-lost vitolas, btw, I desperately miss bolivar demi tasse ?
JohnS Posted December 4, 2018 Posted December 4, 2018 12 hours ago, cfc1016 said: AFAIK the sir Winston is the same blend. It would seem, effectively, the monarcas were simply rebranded. I think @JohnS was the one who told me this. Whaddoiknow, though? HUs have never been my cuppa tea ?♂️ I think Alexander Groom, who runs Cuban Cigar Website, gave me a Tubo Monarch from 2008. I think I smoked it late last year or early this year. After around 10 years, yes the blend had settled a lot, it had some similarities to the Sir Winston when youthful, but in their youth (i.e the Monarch), yes, they were a different blend. 1
TheMonk Posted December 4, 2018 Posted December 4, 2018 The Monarchs really were a fabulous stick... I'm trying to smoke my last box as slowlyyyyy as possible, but it's not easy!
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now