El Presidente Posted August 12, 2015 Posted August 12, 2015 I often point out the disparity in a mastercase. Even I was surprised today because the mastrcase was ULA NOV 14 and ULA is normally pretty consistent. Partagas P2 10's. The Top end of the quality curve The Bottom end of the quality curve Same Mastercase ULA NOV 14
Kyoung Posted August 12, 2015 Posted August 12, 2015 That is unbelievable! Lucky to have FOH and avoid the bottom end quality. Thanks Rob!
Popular Post maxcjs0101 Posted August 12, 2015 Popular Post Posted August 12, 2015 I'd still tap that ash. 7
El Presidente Posted August 12, 2015 Author Posted August 12, 2015 I'd still tap that ash. E-mail Di...they are yours
JohnS Posted August 12, 2015 Posted August 12, 2015 I can just imagine the difference in smoking these, after resting them in my humidor for 30-60 days, from the look of these alone.
Duxnutz Posted August 12, 2015 Posted August 12, 2015 Ive had plenty ugly ducklings turn into swans! Do you think the disparity is the manifesting of the wrapper leaf shortage??
CigSid Posted August 12, 2015 Posted August 12, 2015 This is the reason I am so glad that I found this place...
... Posted August 12, 2015 Posted August 12, 2015 I'm not as knowledgeable as a lot of guys on here, so my intuition could be based on false premises and if so please don't be shy to comment. Seems to me wrapper oiliness and darkness is quite affected by binder leaves and binder oil content. Wrapper is often so thin it is improbable that such a fragile, shade grown leaf be rich in oil and organic compounds. However, binder leaves are often much thicker, with some cigars made using multiple smaller thick plant top leaves instead of a larger thin one. These thicker, sun grown leaves are bound to be richer in oil (produced by the breakdown of organic compounds) which just seep out and wet the wrapper leaf rolled against them. Does it make sense?
oliverdst Posted August 12, 2015 Posted August 12, 2015 Sorry, Rob, second box is fake. You've been scammed!!!
El Presidente Posted August 12, 2015 Author Posted August 12, 2015 I'm not as knowledgeable as a lot of guys on here, so my intuition could be based on false premises and if so please don't be shy to comment. Seems to me wrapper oiliness and darkness is quite affected by binder leaves and binder oil content. Wrapper is often so thin it is improbable that such a fragile, shade grown leaf be rich in oil and organic compounds. However, binder leaves are often much thicker, with some cigars made using multiple smaller thick plant top leaves instead of a larger thin one. These thicker, sun grown leaves are bound to be richer in oil (produced by the breakdown of organic compounds) which just seep out and wet the wrapper leaf rolled against them. Does it make sense? One of the most beautiful things to do in the cigar world is to look at bundles of wrapper leaf. Great wrapper is silky to the touch, thin, oily and tensile/stretches.
BigWill Posted August 12, 2015 Posted August 12, 2015 Wow, I didn't know that they could be that inconsistent in from the same box code. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
jat Posted August 12, 2015 Posted August 12, 2015 On a positive note, at least they stick all the sickly green ones in the same box. How would you be opening the lid and finding a mix
finecigar Posted August 12, 2015 Posted August 12, 2015 That's incredible to see such a variance- wow! Those in the second box are do lifeless. Thanks for sharing
smokeyjoe01 Posted August 12, 2015 Posted August 12, 2015 I am a newbie so please excuse my ignorance... can the colour of the wrapper affect the quality of the cigar? Couldn't both boxes be rolled with the same quality filler & taste similar despite the shade of wrapper leaf? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
treberty Posted August 12, 2015 Posted August 12, 2015 Even though the wrapper leaf may only account for 8-10% of how the cigar will burn and (most importantly) taste, I still always prefer to buy boxes that have nice, oily wrappers. Why take the risk of smoking a cigar that you know could be better? So thanks for being our eyes Rob!
Dbone Posted August 12, 2015 Posted August 12, 2015 Both wrappers look to be oily, I can't tell construction from a picture though. The main disparity appears to be the shade of the wrapper leaf but I'm not sure how that cooresponds to quality? 3
shlomo Posted August 12, 2015 Posted August 12, 2015 Even the bands in the second box have a different colour. What makes that bottom box no good? Is it simply a lighter shade? From the pics, that's all I can see. Not sure what all the other posters see...? 2
SCgarman Posted August 12, 2015 Posted August 12, 2015 Agree Shlomo. There are around 70 shades of wrapper color, also some matte and some oily. Rob's preference is obviously for DARK, OILY wrappers. I truly believe cigars are like women and beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Obviously somebody would prefer the lighter shaded wrappers on the bottom box. I would like to see a blind taste test between a cigar from each box and the results as far as flavor and aroma of lit cigars. In my opinion, it might be real hard to tell any difference between the two. I simply do not believe that wrapper flavor influences a cigar with a larger ring gauge much if not at all. Most of flavor comes from filler and binder leaves. Now a cigar vitola like a Mareva with a 42 ring I would imagine wrapper leaf has more influence. 1
khomeinist Posted August 12, 2015 Posted August 12, 2015 Wrappers make a difference. From my experience the Partagas essence is more evident at the darker end of the spectrum. This does not hold for all marcas. I personally prefer colorado claro wrappers for some of the more subtle blends. ERDM for example.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now