Kangaroo495 Posted July 9, 2009 Share Posted July 9, 2009 Had this last night and thought it was spectacular. Here are the highlights: Construction - looked perfect. No veins, flecks or inconsistencies. Firm but a little spongy along the whole length. Pre-light aroma - Sweet, earthy, could smell it at a distance of about half a metre. Upon lighting - Immediately noticable sweet tobacco aroma 1st/2nd third - didn't really change much in terms of intensity throughout the first 2 thirds. The taste was typical Montecristo - can someone please help me express this in words? It's sweet, possibly cocoa or chocolate... The Edmundos and Especials have a similar flavour which I would describe as "typical Montecristo..." 3rd third - Increase in flavour, much more chocolate, spice. I always enjoy the last few centimetres of this cigar more than the first two thirds. Smoke - Lots of smoke, fairly loose draw. Extremely delicious aroma. I can hardly breath today having inhaled about half of the bloody smoke through my nose trying to catch the aroma as much as I could Burn - Shithouse. Tunneling, uneven, constant touch-ups. How do you keep one of these things properly burning?? Smoking time - 1.5 hours. Had to take it slow as it a strong cigar. Felt light headed after (which never happens usually). What a stunning cigar! Monte is my favourite brand, and I think it cops a a fair bit of **** on the forum for its inconsistencies (not to mention the Open Line which probably deserves what it gets). Petit Edmundo was actually the first Cuban cigar I ever smoked, and is the reason why I'm still smoking Cubans to this day. It took me away from that terrible NC habit I'd developed, so it certainly deserves some credit. So leave Monte alone! They rock. In fact, why not do a round of Monte reviews here! Too much Bolivar all the time! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rsrinivasan Posted July 9, 2009 Share Posted July 9, 2009 Nice review, do you happen to know what the box code was? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeromeroselli Posted July 9, 2009 Share Posted July 9, 2009 Had a Monte PE last week. Man I love this cigar. Loads of montecristo. Does anyone else notice the draw on these is often wide open? Not that I mind it, but I've never had a monte pe that was even a little tight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colt45 Posted July 9, 2009 Share Posted July 9, 2009 Thanks for the review. I have to admit I've never tried one - I just can't come to grips with the format. Is there really such a thing as too much Bolivar? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kangaroo495 Posted July 10, 2009 Author Share Posted July 10, 2009 Nice review, do you happen to know what the box code was? No box code. I got a single sent to me from CC last month. Wanted to see how they are smoking these days. So if Pres knows what box they were taken from, then he could answer your question... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kangaroo495 Posted July 10, 2009 Author Share Posted July 10, 2009 Thanks for the review.I have to admit I've never tried one - I just can't come to grips with the format. Is there really such a thing as too much Bolivar? Colt, you have to try one!!! I would say they're slightly better than their big brother Edmundo... What's wrong with the format? Ok, I was probably going a bit over the top with "too much Bolivar"... Humble apologies Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colt45 Posted July 10, 2009 Share Posted July 10, 2009 What's wrong with the format? When it comes to cigars, short and fat is not where I'm at But if / when the opportunity arises, I shall give one a try. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kangaroo495 Posted July 31, 2009 Author Share Posted July 31, 2009 When it comes to cigars, short and fat is not where I'm at But if / when the opportunity arises, I shall give one a try. Colt, have you managed to try one yet? Would be interested to find out your thoughts... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colt45 Posted August 2, 2009 Share Posted August 2, 2009 Colt, have you managed to try one yet? Would be interested to find out your thoughts... I've not tried one yet, but have it on the short list of singles to try. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jakester Posted August 5, 2009 Share Posted August 5, 2009 I agree with Colt, in that I'm generally not too fond of short, large-ring cigars. However, I have really enjoyed my 06 PE's. I do have some 08s as well, that I've not yet sampled. Like others that have responded, I've also found that the draw tends to be open on these, so I tend to use a very small punch or cut the smallest possible opening in order to avoid ruining the draw. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shrink Posted August 5, 2009 Share Posted August 5, 2009 About a year ago, I got a box of SEP07. The one I sampled was really strong and tannic, so I put 'em away. I thought it had potential, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buch0 Posted August 13, 2009 Share Posted August 13, 2009 Nice review mate. I actually had a Monte Edmundo Tubos the other day at the pub and enjoyed every second of it. I wasn't expecting much in all honestly but I was met with some spice and almondy flavours throughout the smoke. Mixed with a few cold extra drys it made for an enjoyable hour or so. Long live Monte! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SixburghDynasty Posted August 14, 2009 Share Posted August 14, 2009 I like the Monte PE because I'm a big fan of shorter smokes and the PE is one of the few shorts with a thicker ring gauge. Most of the shorties to choose from have 40-42 ring gauges. You've also got the SD5, Hoyo Short Robusto, and RyJ Short Church. I think the Monte PE is the best of the bunch. I wish they made more shorties in thicker rings, not like turds, but say 46-52. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dicko Posted August 21, 2009 Share Posted August 21, 2009 had one tonight. very good. was also the first cuban i tried. had a 3pack gifted to me at the start of the year. those had a nice peppery start and moved into a creamy and then mocha/cocoa type complexity. tonights (from a second 3 pk purchase) was good and although i got some nice coffee cream type flavour profile 2 & 3rd never really hit that mocha/chocolate note which i hoped for after my previous experience. an extra layer of complexity which would have been nice. lovely plumes of thick smoke, and decent (slightly too loose) draw but it was also for me a massive pain keeping this thing burning straight! also had to chuck it with a fair length left. different, probably younger origin from the fist lot of 3 i had. ha watch this student NOT leave anything to rest for more then 3/4 months! i wish! having said that it was still very enjoyable, and a bottle of redman coonawarra cab during with mates kept it fun! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arnehd Posted August 21, 2009 Share Posted August 21, 2009 Hi, my name is Arne. I didn't get to introduce myself yet, but I just had to reply here. I just love this cigar and this was the one which really got me hooked on cuban cigars about two years ago, so I'm probably a bloody beginner. While I had smoked a couple of cubans before that, it was the first time i got that milkcoffee and cream taste. I've had some with a disastrous burn, ones with a very loose draw and even some on the tight side, but the taste was always on. Like in whisky, there is a cigar to get everyone hooked. THis was my Ardbeg 10. I've got a box from 07. And after just having smoked a non cuban (Danneman blabla reserva) I think I should light one up to redeem myself. So thanks for mentioning my first love (which burns and doesn't fade away). Ok, this ones draw is a loose as can be... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kangaroo495 Posted August 24, 2009 Author Share Posted August 24, 2009 Had one in Barcelona last week. It was as black as a Dominican Maduro. Never seen such a colour on a Cuban cigar before. The aroma was exactly like the appearance of the cigar - thick, chocolately, pungeant. However, the cigar was not as full bodied as I'm used to from PE, and the flavour did not develop that much. Still love em though. Was also my first Cuban ever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maalouly Posted August 25, 2009 Share Posted August 25, 2009 I love PE and quite like for format as well, I love my robusto and PR are the 2nd best for me. Enjoyed reading your review cheers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chrisguinther Posted August 25, 2009 Share Posted August 25, 2009 I've went through a few 10-ct boxes of these since their release and have really enjoyed them. I had my first tubo last week and found the initial aroma to be very barnyardesque. I had to let it sit out for nearly a day, but it was still a great smoke. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BolivarSmoker Posted September 21, 2009 Share Posted September 21, 2009 Had one yesterday morning. TOE ABR 08. Not the best looking cigars in the world (the wrappers on this box seem to be pretty rough) but still delivers that classic Montecristo taste. Good stick.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken Gargett Posted September 21, 2009 Share Posted September 21, 2009 really interested in this review. have notes for one i'm intending (good intentions) to post. also thye full (edmundo) monty, as it were. also staggered by the responses. to pre-empt myself, it started superbly with classic monte characters but for most it was simply awful. the full (edmundo) monty was another kettle of fish - absolutely superb. will get the reviews up asap. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bartolomeo Posted October 18, 2009 Share Posted October 18, 2009 Monte Petite Edmundo GEA SEP 08 Pre draw had good cedar, spice and a hint of sweetness Wrapper was Montecristo Brown/Tan, not oily or dry, no veins, foot was a little mangled and cigar was hard, tightly packed Burn was slightly off but never caused a problem, draw had some nice resistance Started off Mild-Med then progressed stronger I will agree that this is the strongest Monte I have had so far 63 min smoke time Initial puff was like Banana Peppers spicy It had a subtle smoke with some flavors to keep your attention This was the second one I bought and was a lot better overall than the first one I smoked, probably to letting it settle in Humi Flavors were dry cedar, dry mocha, chocolate, strong tobacco taste with some light ground pepper…..Very Zesty overall Aftertaste was like a light, Hershey’s Kiss flavor 9/10 I would buy a box just to see what happens down the road Bart Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thechenman Posted October 19, 2009 Share Posted October 19, 2009 I never quite seem to be able to get up to an hour on the Petit Robustos... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bartolomeo Posted November 4, 2009 Share Posted November 4, 2009 Monte Petite Edmundo RTO MAY 07 Got a box of these after enjoying some singles I tested Very similar review to my other review above, but this cigar was a little more rich and smooth, tad more complex Flavors: Tannin, dry cocoa, salty.........rich tasting with some heat Initial puff was like sweet Wasabi Creamy Latte in 2/3 Smoke time was 47 mins Cigar was hard, almost thought too hard until I lit it up and then it was great, some veins, stretched wrinkled wrapper Overall pretty good and I am happy with my box purchase 9.15/10 Bart Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dicko Posted November 4, 2009 Share Posted November 4, 2009 had two 3 packs of these. one 3 pk was awesome the other was average. the first bunch were 07's and the second bunch I'm assuming 08's. maybe those initial releases were better... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frenchkiwi Posted November 4, 2009 Share Posted November 4, 2009 About a year ago, I got a box of SEP07. The one I sampled was really strong and tannic, so I put 'em away. I thought it had potential, though. KG:really interested in this review. have notes for one i'm intending (good intentions) to post. also thye full (edmundo) monty, as it were. also staggered by the responses. to pre-empt myself, it started superbly with classic monte characters but for most it was simply awful. the full (edmundo) monty was another kettle of fish - absolutely superb. will get the reviews up asap. Someone asked about original release - well i've got half a box of 10 left and i can happily agree with KG and shrink - a hint of montecristo flavour here and there but on the whole strongleather/tannic but not particularly enjoyable. Nice to look at but that's it. I have little hope that the rest will age gracefully! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.e2a46b57b5880109ddf171d1b6f9daea.png)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now