Recommended Posts

Posted

Going to smoke more D4s from now, was a nice smoke!

  • Like 2
Posted

My draw was poor but I enjoyed #2, which tracks as I rather enjoy D4s. Clearly not enough to call them blind, but CoRo is a hell of a compliment. 

Posted
1 hour ago, JohnS said:

It will be interesting to see if @Superhans, @EMC12, @vvvendo1969, @griller can continue their streak with Cigar Number 3.

Probably 75% of the Cuban cigars I smoke are RASS and D4/D5 so I was confident on 1 and 2. I've tried 3 and 4 and don't have a clue on either. 5 will be a complete punt.

  • Like 4
Posted

2 from 2! 😂 Giving yas a head start for my 3-fa. 

  • Haha 1
Posted

So surprised with this one! Wow. Not only is Partagas my favorite but I just smoked a D4 a few days prior. I got nothing Partagas in my cigar #2. I really wouldn't even buy my cigar #2 lol.

Ready for cigar #3 this week! Hopefully I can bounce back. Loving this competition so far! 

  • Like 3
Posted

I smoke a decent amount of D4, truly thought it was a D4 from the cold draw. Maybe I just got a classic example.

Posted

For the record, I did not forget to send my choice for cigar #2. In fact, I sent it in a week early! However, given that my choice was Rafael Gonzales Coronas de Lonsdale, I think Lisa took pity on me and quietly dropped my entry. :lol:

  • Like 1
  • Haha 3
Posted

Another miss for me, though I did think it would be PSD4 or Epi 2 but I went the wrong way. I was hoping this one would be a lock, may well go 0/5.

I'm pretty sure cigar #5 is a Bolivar but it's too fat to be a BPC and too skinny to be a BRC. Not sure if 3 and 4 are Robustos or Hermosos, and that was my mistake on cigar #1.

  • Like 2
Posted

Interesting results. While there were a few taking the RASS for a D4 (or D5 - Luca/Fuzz 👏), vice versa, nobody mistook the D4 for RASS. 👍

That gives hope to the ‘concept’ of flavour profiles… 😄

  • Like 2
Posted
6 hours ago, Bijan said:

Another miss for me, though I did think it would be PSD4 or Epi 2 but I went the wrong way. I was hoping this one would be a lock, may well go 0/5.

I'm pretty sure cigar #5 is a Bolivar but it's too fat to be a BPC and too skinny to be a BRC. Not sure if 3 and 4 are Robustos or Hermosos, and that was my mistake on cigar #1.

3 and 4 are exactly the same size as 1 & 2. Cigar 5 is a Hermoso #4. That being said, I'm done. I'm guessing BHK 58 for the last 3. IDGAF anymore.

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Posted
5 hours ago, Fugu said:

Interesting results. While there were a few taking the RASS for a D4 (or D5 - Luca/Fuzz 👏), vice versa, nobody mistook the D4 for RASS. 👍

That gives hope to the ‘concept’ of flavour profiles… 😄

Maybe a bit of that, but RASS was already out as an option, assuming no duplicate cigars.

Edit: though some may have emailed in all guesses ahead of time, in which case what you said would still apply. 

  • Thanks 1
Posted

Haha, ahh, ok, got it! Thanks @Bijan, didn’t follow the procedure that closely. In that case, the potential gain in knowledge from the whole thing is - hmm, let’s put it - limited. (note to Rob: next time request all results be submitted at once 😅)

On another note. I think the task here is extremely challenging. Contest-cigars are within less than one year from boxing. I bet I am not the only one with the finding that cigars start developing their typical marca-specific profiles (if at all) not before some minimum period of maturing. Would love to see such a blind tasting performed on cigars aged for a minimum of three years. Though, granted, logistically demanding.

  • Like 1
Posted

17 guesses for Bolivar Royal Corona in the first round (RASS got 12). 12 guesses for HDM Epicure No 2 in second round (PD4 got 9).

  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Fugu said:

On another note. I think the task here is extremely challenging. Contest-cigars are within less than one year from boxing. I bet I am not the only one with the finding that cigars start developing their typical marca-specific profiles (if at all) not before some minimum period of maturing. Would love to see such a blind tasting performed on cigars aged for a minimum of three years. Though, granted, logistically demanding.

Last year had I think 3 out of 5 cigars aged. Figuring out which ones were aged was part of the challenge.

Posted

I am pretty sure the cigars used for this context were super fresh, i.e. less than 1 year on them. 

14 hours ago, Fugu said:

Haha, ahh, ok, got it! Thanks @Bijan, didn’t follow the procedure that closely. In that case, the potential gain in knowledge from the whole thing is - hmm, let’s put it - limited. (note to Rob: next time request all results be submitted at once 😅)

On another note. I think the task here is extremely challenging. Contest-cigars are within less than one year from boxing. I bet I am not the only one with the finding that cigars start developing their typical marca-specific profiles (if at all) not before some minimum period of maturing. Would love to see such a blind tasting performed on cigars aged for a minimum of three years. Though, granted, logistically demanding.

I resonate with that @Fugu Pretty sure the cigars used for this contest were fresh, i.e. only a few months on them. Most of the cigars in my batch were somewhat muted except #5 -  so let's see! 

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Community Software by Invision Power Services, Inc.