Jones Posted November 18, 2014 Share Posted November 18, 2014 Hello everyone a bfrief introduction, I am from Texas and I have not been smoking cigars that long and I am currently building a collection of the ones I like. So far I have Party shorts, Bolviar Pc, Monte #4 and AF short stories (nc). I enjoy a shorter smoke in the winter time so thats what I am focusing on. Any way, I have heard varying reports of tubos and non tubos being the same thing, tubos being better and vice versa the comunity seems to be split in the issue but my question pertains specialy to Bolviar PCs and #2 tubos. The look to be the same cigar but a popular website lists the tubos filler as being inferior quality to the PCs. To me this dosent seem very efficent for the factory, surely it would be cheaper and easier to use the same filler but I dont know. So i thought I would ask you guys if you have noticed any diffrences between the two ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heawns Posted November 18, 2014 Share Posted November 18, 2014 I haven't compared them from the same year, though they seem similar enough. In a lot of places it seems easier to find the tubos with age on them. For aging some say the tubes are great, and perhaps even the cedar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mk05 Posted November 18, 2014 Share Posted November 18, 2014 I would love to see this popular website you refer to...wait...dammit...you got me. Well played. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
topdiesel Posted November 18, 2014 Share Posted November 18, 2014 I actually prefer the Tubos No.2 You should try for yourself. If you like the PC I think you will be really surprised at how good the tubo No 2 is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
finecigar Posted November 18, 2014 Share Posted November 18, 2014 I actually prefer the tubos and they've always been a go to rotation that were superior to PCs in construction and aging from my experience. I had no idea they we "inferior" filler. Nonetheless they both are a worthy buy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jones Posted November 18, 2014 Author Share Posted November 18, 2014 I would love to see this popular website you refer to...wait...dammit...you got me. Well played. I didnt link the web site because its a retailer and I didnt think that was appropriate. I swear its not some mind game trick haha. Ok you guys seem to agree thats its the same or better so I will add a couple singles to my next order and try them, thanks for the advice guys. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smallclub Posted November 18, 2014 Share Posted November 18, 2014 Ok you guys seem to agree thats its the same or better so I will add a couple singles to my next order and try them, thanks for the advice guys. I don't agree. I've never had a No.2 A/T that was on par with a pc from a nice box or cab. Purchasing the tubos when you can have the pc for much less $ is a strange choice to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heawns Posted November 18, 2014 Share Posted November 18, 2014 This is all interesting... I do prefer the PC as well (slightly), though all my Tubos no.2 were from 2007, and the PC are from 2012-2014. So it might just be I like a bit more punch and pungency... The 2013 January PC boxes were awesome, some rose flavor in varying intensity (almost too bitter/aromatic at times). As far as rolling quality, I would say it is a dead race (very good for the largest part), though the tubed ones had slightly less under-filling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
garbandz Posted November 18, 2014 Share Posted November 18, 2014 tubes are more likely to have mold due to the confined atmosphere. I have found no difference in quality of construction in tubes/boxes. Tubes will keep aromas longer and perhaps maintain a young flavor longer than a box,due to less available oxygen to the cigar. In long term ageing,tubes may produce a more flavorful smoke,with more aroma.I have little personal data on this,having had few aged tubos.Certainly the ones I have had were extremely nice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maplepie Posted November 19, 2014 Share Posted November 19, 2014 There was a discussion on this a while ago. I summed up what I said: Bolivar 2 is the closest recent production Bolivar to the discontinued Corona Extras and Lonsdales of yesteryear. Amazing profile. Will need some age, though. Not many people agree with me, though. Sent from the Enigma on Tapatalk for BlackBerry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soutso Posted November 19, 2014 Share Posted November 19, 2014 I must admit that I assumed they were the same and that the price difference was simply related the different packaging. I avoid tubes as too many have arrived to me upon delivery with white mold. The tubes are cool though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baldy Posted November 19, 2014 Share Posted November 19, 2014 Ok you guys seem to agree thats its the same or better so I will add a couple singles to my next order and try them, thanks for the advice guys. A word of advice. No matter what anyone tells you about anything in this hobby, the only way to know for certain is to smoke 1, 2,3 or 25 yourself. Then and only then will you ever know. It makes no difference if I tell you it's the same or different and which of the two is better. It only matters to me and my own tastes, mood, environmental condition, mental condition, drink pairing, alignment of the stars,...... None of this will do you any good until your own taste buds tell you so. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smallclub Posted November 19, 2014 Share Posted November 19, 2014 Bolivar 2 is the closest recent production Bolivar to the discontinued Corona Extras and Lonsdales of yesteryear. Amazing profile. Will need some age, though. Not many people agree with me, though. People disagreed for a good reason. To begin with, the CE and the lonsdale had different profile, if a cigar is close to one it can't be close to the other at the same time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
topdiesel Posted November 19, 2014 Share Posted November 19, 2014 People disagreed for a good reason. To begin with, the CE and the lonsdale had different profile, if a cigar is close to one it can't be close to the other at the same time. You are so confrontational. People are allowed to have different opinions than yours. Every cigar is different to each person. If we don't share your perspective on flavor, no one is wrong, just different. We are not trying to sell a product or being dishonest. Just giving our opinion to a question that was asked. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smallclub Posted November 19, 2014 Share Posted November 19, 2014 You are so confrontational. People are allowed to have different opinions than yours. The Bolivar CE and the Bolivar lonsdale had completely different profiles, that's a fact, not an opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
topdiesel Posted November 19, 2014 Share Posted November 19, 2014 ok, thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now