Davidoff Number 1   

24 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

Posted

Interesting mix of wrapper shade. And I would've expected the bands to be far more stained. After that, I got nothing. Vintage Davidoff are a white whale I schmuck like me has no familiarity with. 

Inspector Clouseau has spoken. You're welcome.   

  • JohnS changed the title to Calling FOH Colombos: Davidoff Number 1
Posted

Like @rcarlson mentioned, I also couldn't imagine that a box of Davidoff No.1s would have so much variance in wrapper shade. Someone's most likely got a hold of some older singles of Montecristo Especials and replaced the bands with Davidoff bands they've acquired of eBay. Just my 2 cents.

  • Like 3
Posted

The cigar shades are a huge problem for me. The quality of the sticks varies as well. Some of those heads look like c**p. As for the box code, I'll quote CCW.  "Cuban cigar boxes produced since 1985 contain a coded date stamp. Prior to 1985, there was no official date identification on boxes (some dealers dated the boxes themselves, usually handwritten in pencil)."

I've seen penciled in box codes on older boxes. This stamp looks every odd. It looks like someone put this together from here and there. 

 

  • Like 1
Posted

Only ever smoked these in the 5-pack cardboard where each cigar was in cellophane. I would expect to see a little oxidation on the gold leaf lettering. 

  • Like 1
Posted

The price alone tells you there is something fishy. 

  • Like 3
Posted

The box looks right, but the cigars are a little on the rustic side, especially if they’re trying to say this box was from the 70s, which was the beginning of Davidoffs venture with Cubatabaco and El Laguito. They were very specific on all their material being top of the top so I would expect to see almost vein-less wrappers. Every Davidoff I have seen were light in color more along the Cohiba lines.

  • Like 3
Posted

A little more sauce to the dish. 

The same seller put these up today. ;)

 

1.png

2.png

3.png

4.png

5.png

6.png

7.png

  • Confused 1
Posted

They're supposed to be Cohiba Esplendidos? There's no sheen, no vitality whatsoever to the wrappers at all. Not Cohiba-like in any way.

  • Like 4
Posted

None of the older Cuban Davidoffs I've seen have wrappers that rough. Granted, I have only seen a very limited selection, but those look pretty egregious. I don't think they would have gotten past Davidoff QC. 

  • Like 4

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Community Software by Invision Power Services, Inc.