Romeo y Julieta Wide Churchill: 1-3 (Poor) 4-6 (Average to good) 7-10 (very good to excellent)   

33 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

Posted

Wasn’t paying attention and thought this was the Churchill….but I still think my votes apply. I think the Wide Churchill is more dependable construction-wise. Too many plugged Churchills. 

  • Like 2
Posted

I've smoked one or two and loved them. Need to add a box but as I've got two of the regular RyJs Churchill and they're pretty similar in flavour (to me) I haven't gotten around to it. 

  • Like 1
Posted

My 2021's have been very good as of lately (sorry no box date). They needed 3+ years to bring out the cherry and they are worth it. I recently purchased a box of 2019's that I have not tried yet. Not a big fan of the fat ring gauge but the flavors make up for it.

  • Like 3
Posted
4 hours ago, Mike Mecklenburg said:

 Not a big fan of the fat ring gauge but the flavors make up for it.

My thoughts exactly. Similarly for the Hoyo Rio Seco. Love the blend but the gauge restricts the number of outings I give it. 

 

  • Like 3
Posted
23 minutes ago, Ford2112 said:

The same can be said for the Wide Edmundo. I overlook the size because that blend is outstanding.  Over the years I have found the Wide Churchills inconsistent. 

The Wide Edmundo is the cigar that taught me I don’t enjoy smoking 54+ rg cigars. You’re right that the blend is outstanding, but about halfway through I start wishing I lit ANYTHING 52 or less.

  • Like 4

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Community Software by Invision Power Services, Inc.