Recommended Posts

Posted

Excellent post, Ken! When you get a chance, look up what Uncle Albert was referring to when he said “spooky actions at a distance.” That one makes all of us armchair physicists laugh!

  • Like 1
Posted

I will take a stab at something not mentioned on that list....Maybe because it started about 15 years ago. The proliferation of parallel processing. We have seen a huge leap forward in computing power due to multi-core processors. This has enabled new technologies to come forward and make things like smart phones REALLY fast.

  • Like 4
Posted
7 hours ago, avaldes said:

I will take a stab at something not mentioned on that list....Maybe because it started about 15 years ago. The proliferation of parallel processing. We have seen a huge leap forward in computing power due to multi-core processors. This has enabled new technologies to come forward and make things like smart phones REALLY fast.

Just wait until quantum computing becomes mainstream. And the progress that will stem from it. 

  • Like 1
Posted
19 hours ago, avaldes said:

I will take a stab at something not mentioned on that list....Maybe because it started about 15 years ago. The proliferation of parallel processing. We have seen a huge leap forward in computing power due to multi-core processors. This has enabled new technologies to come forward and make things like smart phones REALLY fast.

Some of that it is the same exponential growth as before. The number of transistors kept increasing, but at some point clock rate couldn't go up anymore (my first computer ran at 10MHz, but they have been at 3000-4000MHz/3-4GHz for well over a decade now, I guess about 15 years ago as you say), and single core performance peaked so it finally made sense to have parallel processors on consumer systems. Before that you'd just put in the fastest single processor you could and just switch between apps every few ms, to get the same effect (still do because you still usually have more apps/processes than cpu cores).

Now we are starting to reach the limits of miniaturization and it may be that the number of transistors per chip won't keep on growing exponentially anymore.

New approaches and quantum computing mean there's still a lot of room to grow hopefully.

  • Like 4
Posted

In scientific computing, multi-threading has enabled us to run simulations with a level of discretization that was unthinkable 20 years ago. I remember taking classes then and having to balance mesh density against computing power. Today it is possible to spin up a couple thousand cores and run simulations that give us far better insight into our studies. Computational fluid dynamics, finite element modeling, large scale interacting time based simulations, heck even animation is now running with mesh densities that are so fine the renderings look incredible. I am quite excited to see how things progress in the next 20 years as computer science evolves.

Posted
15 minutes ago, avaldes said:

I am quite excited to see how things progress in the next 20 years as computer science evolves.

Agreed.  But also concerned re the potential threats posed by AI.

There are some interesting videos/cautions on YouTube by Elon Musk.  Worth watching.

Posted
23 minutes ago, GoodStix said:

But also concerned re the potential threats posed by AI.

For some reason I'm not concerned about this. I just think we'll have figured out how to contain it like nuclear weapons by the time it's powerful enough to kill us. 

And am I the only one who doesn't really think we'll see fully synthetic humans? I just don't think we're going to have Blade Runner-style replicants mingling about. I'm not even sure C3P0-like robots will be running around answering the door and cooking dinner. A little too "Jetsons" for me.

Posted
7 hours ago, GoodStix said:

Agreed.  But also concerned re the potential threats posed by AI.

There are some interesting videos/cautions on YouTube by Elon Musk.  Worth watching.

7 hours ago, NSXCIGAR said:

For some reason I'm not concerned about this. I just think we'll have figured out how to contain it like nuclear weapons by the time it's powerful enough to kill us. 

And am I the only one who doesn't really think we'll see fully synthetic humans? I just don't think we're going to have Blade Runner-style replicants mingling about. I'm not even sure C3P0-like robots will be running around answering the door and cooking dinner. A little too "Jetsons" for me.

 

We already have Synths/Replicants, and they are almost lifelike....

 

Sacha Baron Cohen on Twitter: "In any other company, Mark Zuckerberg would  have been fired years ago. But Facebook is a one-man dictatorship. Mark  alone controls 60% of voting shares--and the FB

  • Like 1
  • Haha 3
Posted

And here I thought Gorilla Tape was the biggest invention of late.

  • Haha 1
Posted
7 hours ago, Fuzz said:

We already have Synths/Replicants, and they are almost lifelike...

I thought he was supposed to be one of the lizard people. George Bush, Tony Blair, Madonna too.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Community Software by Invision Power Services, Inc.