Recommended Posts

Posted

You are standing in a room which contains two boxes of every vitola from each marca. All wrappers in all boxes are equally oily. However, one box out of every pair contains darker wrappers.

Would you always pick the darker wrapper?

  • Replies 59
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

No. As an example (rule of thumb) I would choose: Lighter oily wrapers on Cohiba/LGC/HDM/Juan Lopez Darker Oily thin wrappers on Montecristo/Partagas/Bolivar

Just adding to the discussion for the NC piece. The wrapper tobacco is typically 50 - 60% of the overall flavor profile, not 20%. That number is going to vary drastically based on the ring gauge (smal

I'm not sure about flavor but I will tell you that I've found dark wrappers to be much more likely to have combustion problems than lighter wrappers. I'm fact, I'm not sure I've ever encountered a thi

Posted

No. As an example (rule of thumb) I would choose:

Lighter oily wrapers on Cohiba/LGC/HDM/Juan Lopez

Darker Oily thin wrappers on Montecristo/Partagas/Bolivar

Prez,

I get the sense that you have perhaps stood in such a room. I appreciate you chiming in.

Posted

Prez,

I get the sense that you have perhaps stood in such a room. I appreciate you chiming in.

I would love to see more high quality light shiny (oily) tensile wrappers. Quite rare these days.

Posted

Darker Oily thin wrappers on Montecristo/Partagas/Bolivar

Prez,

Might be a rookie question but I'm relatively new, how can you tell a thin wrapper from one which is thick?

Posted
Might be a rookie question but I'm relatively new, how can you tell a thin wrapper from one which is thick?

Compare a Nicaraguan cigar to a Quai d'Orsay or a Cohiba. It's obvious to the touch/feel.

  • Like 1
Posted

Compare a Nicaraguan cigar to a Quai d'Orsay or a Cohiba. It's obvious to the touch/feel.

If by the more delicate/less rugged feel of the Cohiba or Orsay then I know exactly what you mean! Just never thought to associate that feeling with a thinner wrapper but makes sense! Thanks

Guest Robusto 107
Posted

Some experienced people said dark wrapper on light body cigar are likely bitter taste. Is that true? I just have one time experience when I got a dark ERDM CS 50s years ago, heavily bittered cannot smoke.

Posted

I am firmly in the "lighter is better" camp. Most PSP or HQ selections posted in the 24:24 don't turn me on at all.

  • Like 1
Posted

Prez,

Might be a rookie question but I'm relatively new, how can you tell a thin wrapper from one which is thick?

Even as a rookie you can tell (even in a pic) Which wrapper is thicker on these two sticks (or 'toothier' as some might say)

284d387517eeabd1bbb5febc0ca6d616.jpg

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Posted

No. As an example (rule of thumb) I would choose:

Lighter oily wrapers on Cohiba/LGC/HDM/Juan Lopez

Darker Oily thin wrappers on Montecristo/Partagas/Bolivar

I'm exactly on par with this, with the exception being that those lighter wrappers are a rosado

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

Will a thin wrapper ever be toothy? Or is that a distinctive feature of a thicker wrapper?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

All in the eye of the beholder I guess, but I wouldn't describe a thin wrapper as 'toothy'.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

Smoked some amazing Monte Especials last night with Claro wrappers,, almost green. Awesome smokes.

It's more about the tobacco in general and the leaf itself than the wrapper color for me.

  • Like 2
Posted

Fairly certain "toothiness" has nothing to do with thickness of wrapper leaf....

That was my understanding but given the above I thought I may be wrong. Isn't "Toothiness" just the little bumps on the wrapper? I have seen some toothy wrappers which I considered thin wrapper. Not sure now...

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

That was my understanding but given the above I thought I may be wrong. Isn't "Toothiness" just the little bumps on the wrapper? I have seen some toothy wrappers which I considered thin wrapper. Not sure now...

Toothiness is another description for the veins on the wrapper. You are actually more inclined to encounter veins on a wrapper the darker it is...unless manufacturers artficially make their wrappers a 'maduro' shade, but that's another story!
Posted

Toothiness is another description for the veins on the wrapper. You are actually more inclined to encounter veins on a wrapper the darker it is...unless manufacturers artficially make their wrappers a 'maduro' shade, but that's another story!

That's what I initially thought but then I read that it is the little bumps on the wrapper. I also saw a YouTube video from cigarobsession explaining it at the bumps too. Now I don't know what to think lol

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

Toothiness is another description for the veins on the wrapper.

No, toothiness is not related to the veins. A wrapper can be "toothy" without a single apparent vein, and it can be very veiny without a single tooth.

Posted

Wrappers account for 8-10% of the taste. High quality wrappers help for consistency of the burning - just as the binder leaf does, but we can't inspect it!

Therefore I think it's a matter of preference (or a psychological block in my case ;-) ) I would never buy a box of really dark Lusis (and most Partagas for that matter) - they have to be a nice brown (colorado or colorado maduro at the most), just like my Juan Lopez #2 need to be what is called rosado here... On the other hand, a nice maduro shade compliments Montecristos, especially if they're oily. That's why opening the boxes (or having someone that inspects each box for me) is so important. Different tastes for each aficionado I guess.

Remember the girls you dated when you were 16: the prettiest ones were not always the most fun - same goes for cigars jester.gif

So in short, to me anyways, a wrapper is a good indicator of the quality of the box, but not necessarily the only one - smell is more important IMO.

Posted
On 9/8/2015 at 5:03 PM, Scrubber said:

That's what I initially thought but then I read that it is the little bumps on the wrapper. I also saw a YouTube video from cigarobsession explaining it at the bumps too. Now I don't know what to think lol

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

On 9/8/2015 at 8:57 PM, Smallclub said:

No, toothiness is not related to the veins. A wrapper can be "toothy" without a single apparent vein, and it can be very veiny without a single tooth.

I stand corrected...toothiness does indeed refer to little bumps in a wrapper. Below is a quote from Gary Korb at Cigar Advisor...

Toothy refers to the rough-textured feel of the wrapper leaf like Connecticut Broadleaf, as opposed to the silky feel of Connecticut Shade. This toothiness comes from tiny pimples on the leaf, that are filled with tobacco oils, and usually the result of sun-grown wrappers.

Toothy wrappers on cigars are a good thing. The advantage to toothy leaves are: they tend to be more oily and flavorful. Both Sumatra and Cameroon leaf are naturally toothy, and when cured properly, are sweet in flavor and very aromatic. The toothiest tobacco leaf of all is African Cameroon, but toothiness is found in wrappers from just about every tobacco-growing country.

What is interesting here though is the assertion that toothy wrappers tend to be sun grown. Sun grown wrappers are more likely to have veins than shade grown (and be less silky), hence most probably explaining the confusion that can occur on what 'toothiness' is.

  • Thanks 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Community Software by Invision Power Services, Inc.