winelover Posted February 1, 2014 Posted February 1, 2014 I'm still not sure what it brings to the table that the petit Edmundo, #4, #3 or #5 doesn't already bring. Why no straight up monte robusto? Agreed. Not interested at all. Gimme a monte 4 for a high quality shorter smoke or even a petit edmundo.
mbrody Posted February 1, 2014 Posted February 1, 2014 Wish they made the P1 regular production instead. Monte has enough.
shlomo Posted February 1, 2014 Posted February 1, 2014 Wish they made the P1 regular production instead. Monte has enough. agreed! the p1 is a good cigad that when one smokes it, knows without a doubt that it is s partagas. unlike the p2... if you like the flavours in the p1, give the presidentes a try. more robust and in your face, but very enjoyable. 2
maverickdrinker Posted February 1, 2014 Posted February 1, 2014 Decent cigar. Better than the double Edmundo. Not worth the coin IMHO
ramon_cojones Posted February 2, 2014 Posted February 2, 2014 agreed! the p1 is a good cigad that when one smokes it, knows without a doubt that it is s partagas. unlike the p2... if you like the flavours in the p1, give the presidentes a try. more robust and in your face, but very enjoyable. agree with mbrody, p1 is excellent as is prezi
winelover Posted February 3, 2014 Posted February 3, 2014 What Montecristo needs is a Churchill. Agree, would even buy if LE or RE but it won't happen.
Philprop Posted February 3, 2014 Posted February 3, 2014 I'd love to try both, gonna wait until *****IT starts doing the petit 2 in singles then I'll pick up a couple of each and compare young and then after some rest.
El Presidente Posted February 4, 2014 Author Posted February 4, 2014 We will be doing a Vid Review on it tomorrow
EuroTrash Posted February 4, 2014 Posted February 4, 2014 I smoked one of these yesterday and was entirely underwhelmed. Price aside the flavour did not do it for me. Quite bland and young tasting. Not comparable to even a mediocre #2. Taking price into consideration makes this a total flop for me. I'll pass.
sabourin Posted March 18, 2014 Posted March 18, 2014 Just had one. Looked good with a plenty of oil and maduro wrapper. A bit tight but lacking in personality. Very forgetful. Glad I only bought one. 1
Knilas Posted March 19, 2014 Posted March 19, 2014 Had one last week. Was not impressed. Bland and very "chalky" tasting....if that makes any sense. Luckily it was gifted, so I wasn't out any dough. Sent from my XT1080 using Tapatalk
mk05 Posted March 19, 2014 Posted March 19, 2014 I think an argument can be made that if a sample tasted like "straight wood" and/or "tobacco," it was probably rolled at UPE code, for all the reasons therein. I had one recently, tasted like a larger ring gauge Especiales. Pretty good.
cigcars Posted March 19, 2014 Posted March 19, 2014 Had one just last week. Very good smoke however, not as spectacular as the regular Montecristo No.2 IMHO!
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now