galtline Posted November 13, 2013 Posted November 13, 2013 Trying to get an idea how these two compare in taste
oliverdst Posted November 13, 2013 Posted November 13, 2013 Galt, I can't help you about them but you can make a search going to the upper right side of the page (do not forget to click in "This topic" and then choose "Forums") and try to find another BOTL's opinion.
Hohenthal Posted November 13, 2013 Posted November 13, 2013 Perlas are stronger or at least more direct, more woodiness in the flavour; PC's more refined with a sophisticated depth and quality in a medium or under medium body. Superb marca alltogether. Alex 2
Wil Posted November 14, 2013 Posted November 14, 2013 On 11/13/2013 at 10:38 PM, oliverdst said: Galt, I can't help you about them but you can make a search going to the upper right side of the page (do not forget to click in "This topic" and then choose "Forums") and try to find another BOTL's opinion. Or you could just ask here I much prefer the PCs, although I have only smoked a handful of the perlas. The perlas are definitely more direct and robust, with the PC being a little richer and more delicate. Both are great smokes but I'd go with the PC. 1
oliverdst Posted November 14, 2013 Posted November 14, 2013 On 11/14/2013 at 12:00 AM, Wil said: Or you could just ask here I much prefer the PCs, although I have only smoked a handful of the perlas. The perlas are definitely more direct and robust, with the PC being a little richer and more delicate. Both are great smokes but I'd go with the PC. I said that because it had passed 2 hours without an answer and I think he is in a rush to decide about LITW (have them both). 1
yuppie Posted May 1 Posted May 1 I love the wealth of information and opinion I can find by searching these forums. Anyone else want to comment on Rafael Gonzalez Perlas vs. PCs? 1
Habanoschris Posted May 1 Posted May 1 I struggle to answer this. I like the RGPC but I have had both well aged and less aged Perlas that are very good or maybe better too. 😚💨 2
yuppie Posted May 1 Posted May 1 On 5/1/2025 at 3:58 AM, Habanoschris said: I struggle to answer this. I like the RGPC but I have had both well aged and less aged Perlas that are very good or maybe bester too. 😚💨 Expand Chris, I love watching your unboxing videos and hearing your notes. Your video on the Perlas encouraged me to pick up a box of the RGPCs on today's 24:24, then I started looking for comparisons between them. Can't wait to see what you open up next! 3
Allroz Posted May 1 Posted May 1 I am a fan of both and my mood kind of dictates which I gravitate towards. I would agree the Perla is a bit more direct than the PC. 3
Habanoschris Posted May 1 Posted May 1 On 5/1/2025 at 4:16 AM, yuppie said: Chris, I love watching your unboxing videos and hearing your notes. Your video on the Perlas encouraged me to pick up a box of the RGPCs on today's 24:24, Expand Thank you my friend. I appreciate this very much 😚💨 1
Gubbins Posted May 1 Posted May 1 I stock up on Perlas when travelling Europe as they are so cheap there. i figured they needed 2 years of age minimum, but this latest box I’ve bought are smoking fantastic fresh. Very pleasantly surprised. This new box has more rosado hue wrappers than the previous box which was a darker brown. 3
Popular Post Mike Mecklenburg Posted May 2 Popular Post Posted May 2 Tough call but I give the nod to the Petit Corona because I get more flavors. If I'm short on time, I'll go with the Perlas. Always keep both on hand. 6
Montezüma Posted May 2 Posted May 2 I had the Perlas and Lonsdales recently, never had the Petit Coronas. There is a significant difference between these two. The Perlas are filled with intense flavours without being a strong cigar, which is a great short smoke given its size. Tried to push beyond one hour but 45 minutes is really the kind of time-frame this cigar occupies. The price value factor can't be overlooked, the Perlas deliver tremendous value for its price. The Lonsdales are great cigars but are more interchangeable because there are plenty of options out there for its punching weight. It is worth pointing out though that its got a blend that is distinctive, an enjoyable cigar that is particularly earthy for a Cuban cigar and its chocolate and espresso undertones are consistent throughout. As others seem to have mentioned the Petit Coronas as more complex, the same can be said about the Lonsdales. The Perlas although flavoursome, are rather one dimensional, certainly when compared to the Lonsdales. As a whole, without drawing comparisons too far, tasting these two reminds me of Cuban cigars inspired by the very best of Nicaraguan puros.
Ford2112 Posted May 2 Posted May 2 On 5/2/2025 at 4:21 PM, Montezüma said: I had the Perlas and Lonsdales recently, never had the Petit Coronas. There is a significant difference between these two. The Perlas are filled with intense flavours without being a strong cigar, which is a great short smoke given its size. Tried to push beyond one hour but 45 minutes is really the kind of time-frame this cigar occupies. The price value factor can't be overlooked, the Perlas deliver tremendous value for its price. The Lonsdales are great cigars but are more interchangeable because there are plenty of options out there for its punching weight. It is worth pointing out though that its got a blend that is distinctive, an enjoyable cigar that is particularly earthy for a Cuban cigar and its chocolate and espresso undertones are consistent throughout. As others seem to have mentioned the Petit Coronas as more complex, the same can be said about the Lonsdales. The Perlas although flavoursome, are rather one dimensional, certainly when compared to the Lonsdales. As a whole, without drawing comparisons too far, tasting these two reminds me of Cuban cigars inspired by the very best of Nicaraguan puros. Expand What about the Petit Coronas?
JohnS Posted May 2 Posted May 2 On 5/2/2025 at 12:13 AM, Mike Mecklenburg said: Tough call but I give the nod to the Petit Corona because I get more flavors. If I'm short on time, I'll go with the Perlas. Always keep both on hand. Expand Generally speaking, this is exactly how I feel when it comes to these two vitolas. Right now, I have some Rafael Gonzalez Petit Coronas which are excellent on account of their flavour blend, yet; I don't mind having a RG Perlas when I want a lighter, shorter smoke and I'm pressed for time. 2
Popular Post 99call Posted May 2 Popular Post Posted May 2 There are some parallels with Juan Lopez J1&J2 relationship here. - The JL2 would be the RG Perla. Defined, Simple, Generous and Satisfying. - The JL1 would be the RGPC. Complex, Layered, Challenging and Intriguing. 5
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now