Recommended Posts

Posted

The H.Upmann Amatistas was always a cigar difficult to find due to the vitola's rarity and small quantity.

The tobacco for these factory named Superiores, were of the highest quality and in the year 2000, the production of the Amastistas was steped up at the H.Upmann factory but, unfortunately in the course of 2002,it was decided that the Amatistas along with the Gran Coronas also a Superiores size, would be discontinued.

In Min Ron Nee's Encyclopaedia,he states that the Amatistas are cigars for serious aging and that they should be aged at least 5 years from their box date before being smoked.Same for the Gan Coronas .

Well, that's good to know because this week I stumbled :rolleyes: on a box with the factory code

ECA (H.Upmann) from Oct 01.

After opening the box,I was truly surprised & over taken by the smell and aromas that were very intense for these cigars that are exactly 10 years old.

The wrappers are a bit rough but a beautiful Colorado shade.

I will let them rest up before smoking one but, as you may know, I'm not a very patient person. :lol:

Here are a few Pics. of the H.Upmann Amatistas.

post-3705-0-34898400-1320365318.jpg

post-3705-0-88555100-1320365356.jpg

post-3705-0-81387800-1320365374.jpg

post-3705-0-55844700-1320365422.jpg

post-3705-0-24621900-1320365453.jpg

Posted

thats amazing Guy, great find!

Posted

Wow, what a find :spotlight: !! Another cigar I never even heard of before...

Posted

Hey Guy, finally you got them! Bravo!

It seems that they have exactly the same wrappers as the two boxes of Grand Coronas (supposedly the same cigar) I have had the chance to find.

Do you have the impression that some of them might have a tight draw? Anyway, don't smoke them on an empty stomach, these are serious eye-openers! :surprised:

Posted

Do you have the impression that some of them might have a tight draw?

No Frank, I don't regret it, I've made my rounds to check if tight or not, they seem fine . :yes:

We'll see what gives when I light one up . :lookaround::lol:

Posted

I ONLY HAVE HALF A BOX LEFT OF THIS IDENTICAL CODE. FANTASTIC CIGARS.

No need to yell...

Posted

I'm a bit surprised that no one else has commented about how funky the date code stamp looks on that box . . . I still avoid '99-'01, even though many are bragging about them. I just haven't had good luck with anything from those vintages.

Posted

I'm a bit surprised that no one else has commented about how funky the date code stamp looks on that box . . .

It's a bit funky, and then? We have seen much worse…

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Community Software by Invision Power Services, Inc.