El Presidente Posted April 1, 2010 Posted April 1, 2010 Ken and I get get to taste an old favourite of mine. Enjoy!
asmith Posted April 1, 2010 Posted April 1, 2010 were you two smashed when you did this review???? WWSD, well I was thinking of Buffy??? The Mavin Gaye of cgars??? Fresh forest droppings??? Wishy Washy Medium???
Kangaroo495 Posted April 1, 2010 Posted April 1, 2010 were you two smashed when you did this review???? You're asking this seriously, or is it a rhetoric question?
El Presidente Posted April 1, 2010 Author Posted April 1, 2010 I was smashed after it. Not a great reception when I got home. I could still be on the couch tonight.
Kangaroo495 Posted April 1, 2010 Posted April 1, 2010 I was smashed after it. Not a great reception when I got home. I could still be on the couch tonight. That's why you should always come home late - when you know she's asleep. That way you can sneak into the bed and get a decent sleep.
Stalebread Posted April 1, 2010 Posted April 1, 2010 Thanks, guys, for another edition of the Rob-And-Ken Show. A review that manages to be funny and informative at the same time. How do you do that? WWSD?
dicko Posted April 1, 2010 Posted April 1, 2010 ken has a sarah michelle gellar poster up in his room
Habanos2000 Posted April 1, 2010 Posted April 1, 2010 were you two smashed when you did this review???? Smithy, you're absolutely right!
Colt45 Posted April 1, 2010 Posted April 1, 2010 Great "work" guys. I think I disagree some with KG about the balance aspect though - both with cigars and wine. Often enough, I find a good cigar will balance out with time. Just for example, a cigar which might be very peppery and generally disjointed when young, can often integrate and balance out over time - as long as it has all the elements to begin with. Same with wine. I think of very oaky young wines that over time will balance out, allowing all the flavors to show. Of course, it doesn't always work out that way.
shrink Posted April 1, 2010 Posted April 1, 2010 I could still be on the couch tonight. You need to be on the couch alright...
Bartolomeo Posted April 1, 2010 Posted April 1, 2010 I am suggesting a Blood Alcohol Content check next time on the deck for you two, that would pretty funny Bart
El Presidente Posted April 1, 2010 Author Posted April 1, 2010 Great "work" guys. I think I disagree some with KG about the balance aspect though - both with cigars and wine. Often enough, I find a good cigar willbalance out with time. Just for example, a cigar which might be very peppery and generally disjointed when young, can often integrate and balance out over time - as long as it has all the elements to begin with. Same with wine. I think of very oaky young wines that over time will balance out, allowing all the flavors to show. Of course, it doesn't always work out that way. I understand where Ken was coming from and generally in terms of cigars he is right. However I have been caught out several times over the years where a cigar I thought had nothing when young turns into something special with 8-10 years. It is a rare occurrence however in my experience. There are cigars which I am confident will age well and those are the cigars which have an essence of core ingredients albeit those ingredients may be all over the place initially.
Ken Gargett Posted April 1, 2010 Posted April 1, 2010 ken has a sarah michelle gellar poster up in his room i don't, but if you've got one, i'll take it. and i was absolutely totally sober when we started.
Colt45 Posted April 1, 2010 Posted April 1, 2010 There are cigars which I am confident will age well and those are the cigars which have an essence of core ingredients albeit those ingredients may be all over the place initially. Meaning the core ingredients are out of balance? (Balance was my only point of slight disagreement). I agree that in the main, a crappy cigar showing absolutely nothing in it's youth does not magically turn into a gem down the road.
Jimmy2 Posted April 1, 2010 Posted April 1, 2010 Nice review gents and Ken you hit it on the money with a cigar that has the legs for aging it has to be good young (meaning trade mark flavors of a certain brand) if not its a crap shoot. been saying it for years...
Ken Gargett Posted April 2, 2010 Posted April 2, 2010 Nice review gents and Ken you hit it on the money with a cigar that has the legs for aging it has to be good young (meaning trade mark flavors of a certain brand) if not its a crap shoot. been saying it for years... as always jimmy, we are in complete agreement. i actually think it is even more true for wine. i know what colt is saying but i think that is more a situation where all the components are there in the first place. a wine with high levels of oak when young may all meld if the other components such as enough fruit are in place. but if it is overoaked when young and out of balance, i think it extremely rare for things to fall back in place down the track.
Colt45 Posted April 2, 2010 Posted April 2, 2010 .......i think it extremely rare for things to fall back in place down the track. Yes Ken, in my initial post when I said "as long as it has all the elements to begin with", I meant with wine as well as cigars. Please pardon my lack of clarity - I thought I had typed slowly enough for you and bacchus to understand.
El Presidente Posted April 2, 2010 Author Posted April 2, 2010 I thought I had typed slowly enough for you and bacchus to understand. How did I get roped into this? You graphics guys sure are sensitive
Colt45 Posted April 2, 2010 Posted April 2, 2010 How did I get roped into this? Guilt by association. Funny how you immediately knew who I meant by bacchus.....
El Presidente Posted April 2, 2010 Author Posted April 2, 2010 Guilt by association. Funny how you immediately knew who I meant by bacchus..... Doofus..bacchus...all the same
Ken Gargett Posted April 2, 2010 Posted April 2, 2010 Yes Ken, in my initial post when I said "as long as it has all the elements to begin with", I meant with wine as well as cigars. Please pardon my lack of clarity - I thought I had typed slowly enough for you and bacchus to understand. yes, understand but given you also said "a cigar which might be very peppery and generally disjointed when young, can often integrate and balance out over time" which rather condtradicts the last bit leaving us none the wiser, unless you really did want a foot in each of the diametrically opposed camps. but i'll say again, a wine that is disjointed when young really has bugger all chance of becoming balanced down the track. should i use a bigger font? clearly no miracles this easter.
Colt45 Posted April 2, 2010 Posted April 2, 2010 Doofus..bacchus...all the same touché should i use a bigger font? clearly no miracles this easter. It's a miracle you know what a font is.
El Presidente Posted April 2, 2010 Author Posted April 2, 2010 touchéIt's a miracle you know what a font is.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now