Recommended Posts

Posted

A good example of some recent (and relevant) behavioural economics at play, in my resident country of Australia, has been the famous case of the two large supermarket chains, Woolworths and Coles, using 'price anchoring tricks' to increase demand for products during the Covid-19 pandemic (and later). What this means is that a retailer will artificially increase the price of a product for a short time and then claim a discount on the price (after the item has had a stable price for some time), when all they've done is actually increase the price. For example, say a generic brand of chocolate confectionary costs $2, and that price is stable for 12/18/24 months, the retailer lifts the price to $2.50 for around 4 or 5 weeks (Woolworths and Coles had this down to an art, believe me) and then put the item on sale at $2.20. In effect, the price has gone up 20c.

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (shortened usually to the ACCC), the government body that protects consumer rights in Australia, took Woolworths and Coles to Court over the matter, in separate cases, in September 2024. In May 2026, Coles lost their case. The Woolworths case is still pending, but they will lose too. As a consumer, I found it all to be 'poetic justice' because these two retailers dominate the Australian market and have acted as an oligopoly for a number of years now, and getting them on price collusion has not been easy, until this.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-02-28/coles-down-down-accc-court-battle-prices/106382746

https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/court-finds-that-coles-misled-customers-over-down-down-claims

  • Like 2
Posted
14 minutes ago, ATGroom said:

If my inbox is anything to go by, for a great many people the prospect of a good bargain is enough for the 'greed' part of the human brain to absolutely overwhelm the 'logic' section, at least for long enough to get the cigars home and wonder in the cold light of day if perhaps the $3000 dollar box of cigars you just bought for $300 from a random guy on the street might not be totally authentic.

Case in point the Cohiba 30th Aniversario cigars posted by @xiangnan. They are a 30 year old ultra-rare of which only 2,250 sticks were ever produced. It would be impossible to buy a single on the legitimate market today, but if you were to find one it would be at absolute minimum $5,000 a stick.

And yet, every dealer on Instagram can get them in bundles. Price varies depending on how big a sucker he thinks he has on the hook.

Exactly. The availability alone should be enough to give the game away. Something virtually impossible to find legitimately somehow becomes readily available in bundles. Yet people still focus on how much they might be saving rather than asking how the seller has so many of them.Price varies depending on how big a sucker he thinks he has on the hook😂

  • Like 3
Posted
1 hour ago, JohnS said:

A good example of some recent (and relevant) behavioural economics at play, in my resident country of Australia, has been the famous case of the two large supermarket chains, Woolworths and Coles, using 'price anchoring tricks' to increase demand for products during the Covid-19 pandemic (and later). What this means is that a retailer will artificially increase the price of a product for a short time and then claim a discount on the price (after the item has had a stable price for some time), when all they've done is actually increase the price. For example, say a generic brand of chocolate confectionary costs $2, and that price is stable for 12/18/24 months, the retailer lifts the price to $2.50 for around 4 or 5 weeks (Woolworths and Coles had this down to an art, believe me) and then put the item on sale at $2.20. In effect, the price has gone up 20c.

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (shortened usually to the ACCC), the government body that protects consumer rights in Australia, took Woolworths and Coles to Court over the matter, in separate cases, in September 2024. In May 2026, Coles lost their case. The Woolworths case is still pending, but they will lose too. As a consumer, I found it all to be 'poetic justice' because these two retailers dominate the Australian market and have acted as an oligopoly for a number of years now, and getting them on price collusion has not been easy, until this.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-02-28/coles-down-down-accc-court-battle-prices/106382746

https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/court-finds-that-coles-misled-customers-over-down-down-claims

Harvey Norman did that all the time decades ago. Prices rises just before upcoming sales was quite normal for Gerry to implement. And let's not for get the furniture stores that have a summer sale... then a spring sale, followed by the mid year sale... you can't forget the autumn sale, and god forbid if there isn't a Christmas sale. 

It's not so much as price collusion. I used to sit in on those meetings where we'd look at the catalogues for the other major supermarket (not gonna say who I used to work for, but some of you know) and make price discounts just below theirs for the next day. They would do the same. Eventually you come to a point where it is no longer viable to go lower, mainly as the vendor won't give any more discount, and you can't go below a certain percentage. We would even ask staff to bring in their local supermarket catalogues so we could see how individual regions were pricing their goods.

  • Like 3
Posted

With current low stock why would anyone sell original cigars below market price. And because of internet all information asymmetry is gone anyways. There are no deals anymore.

  • Like 3
Posted
15 hours ago, El Presidente said:

We had a good gathering on the cigar deck last Friday when a good mate who lives OS 6 months a year and here the other 6,produced a Monte 2. He buys them by the box in the Middle East for $600 USD. The contact has a contact in Cuba. 

I asked to look at it pre-light and he passed it across. Beautiful cigar. 

I asked him how long he had been buying them. A box a month for two years. He loves them. Never had a bad one, never a construction issue.

I asked him to wait a moment and retrieved a Monte 2 from the humidor. 

Passing him my Monte 2, I asked him to take in the aroma of both cigars at cold.

"Very different" he says

"That's because yours is Dominican" I said.

He got s***ty. Not because his cigar was fake, but because he shouldn't be paying $600 USD for a fake box.

I agreed. $200-$250 would be the right price if he indeed enjoy them 😉

Now I know full well, he would never have bought them originally if they were offered at $250. 

$600 was a plausible amount in his mind for an inside deal on Cuban Monte 2.

That’s exactly it. At $600, the price itself became part of the provenance. At $600, he trusted the story.

  • Like 3
Posted
15 hours ago, xiangnan said:

That’s exactly it. At $600, the price itself became part of the provenance. At $600, he trusted the story. 

Perhaps not trusted the story. But want to believe the story. Reinforcing biases.

  • Like 4
Posted

Great memories Andy 

I remember being at the La Cecilia Open air nightclub in Miramar. We had a table for 10 and somehow ran out of cigars. I recall going to the bathrooms where at the entrance they were selling Cohiba Lanceros...in a cup just like your picture...for under a $1. I bought a dozen. 

They were horrendous. :lol3:

 

  • Haha 4

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Community Software by Invision Power Services, Inc.