Recommended Posts

Posted

I love a great Port! @Ken Gargett, suggestions for recent vintages that should be acquired?

Posted

2016, 2017, 2018 all fabulous, though i have seen far fewer of the 18s. all three great reputations. 16s reminiscent of 77s, 17s of 11. not so sure about the 18s. 

Posted
  On 9/19/2022 at 3:27 AM, MossybackR said:

Sheesh!! That’s some wonderful vintages, @Ken Gargett

Expand  

the criteria for attendance was a good house from a great vintage from last century. 

 

  On 9/19/2022 at 4:09 AM, helix said:

How long is a bottle of port good for after being openned ? What kind of storage ?

Expand  

old vintage ports, i would not be leaving them around long. younger ones, you could recork and put into the fridge for a day or two, or perhaps a little more but better finishing at the sitting if you can.

  • Thanks 1
Posted

Some great ones there.  1970 is considered the single best vintage of the 20th century by many.  The older the Sandeman; the better.

The '94 Noval must've been a beast.  The Seely era of Noval has produced some fantastic stuff.  Even their single and 2nd vintage brands are awesome.

Posted
  On 9/19/2022 at 5:58 PM, BrightonCorgi said:

Some great ones there.  1970 is considered the single best vintage of the 20th century by many.  The older the Sandeman; the better.

The '94 Noval must've been a beast.  The Seely era of Noval has produced some fantastic stuff.  Even their single and 2nd vintage brands are awesome.

Expand  

both the 94s were. agree re noval these days (although they were never bad), although try as i might, i simply don't get the 16. 

70 has always reminded if 88 champagnes. under the radar largely on release but over the years have just continued to show how good the really are. still remember articles wondering whether 70 or 75 would be the better vintage. could never follow that. mind you, i have an article somewhere that debated whether 77 or 78 would be the better vintage. seems crazy now. 

  • Like 1
Posted
  On 9/19/2022 at 10:26 PM, Ken Gargett said:

both the 94s were. agree re noval these days (although they were never bad), although try as i might, i simply don't get the 16. 

70 has always reminded if 88 champagnes. under the radar largely on release but over the years have just continued to show how good the really are. still remember articles wondering whether 70 or 75 would be the better vintage. could never follow that. mind you, i have an article somewhere that debated whether 77 or 78 would be the better vintage. seems crazy now. 

Expand  

1980's really poor for Noval and Nacional.  Not too great for Sandeman, Cockburn, or Croft either.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Community Software by Invision Power Services, Inc.