Popular Post Habana Mike Posted September 17, 2020 Popular Post Posted September 17, 2020 Would love to hear @Ken Gargett thoughts on these two. We quite enjoyed them! 2006 Shafer Hillside Select Stags and the Pol Roger Churchill edition from 2008. Big celebration bottles! #SNOW 5
Fuzz Posted September 17, 2020 Posted September 17, 2020 The Pol Roger was released 2 years ago and has some very high reviews. A friend of mine picked up a bottle last year. We were meant to open it up on her birthday this year, but with Covid (she is Melbourne based), have to wait till we catch up again in the new year. 1
JohnS Posted September 17, 2020 Posted September 17, 2020 I think Ken has actually commented on the Winston Churchill Pol Roger in a Kenfessions article recently. I tend to stick to the Non-Vintage release and I find that excellent. 1 1
BoliDan Posted September 17, 2020 Posted September 17, 2020 The shafer is worth it in my opinion. I can find that for about $200. There is really not many Napa I can say the same for. I'd prefer Willamette or other Washington $12 bottles (Find a 97 chateau St. Michelle Cabernet Sauvignon and Napa has no chance). But to answer your question yes! probably worth $400 a bottle. 3 1
Ken Gargett Posted September 17, 2020 Posted September 17, 2020 i don't see much schafer at all here. i am sure that our american friends will have opinions far more worthwhile than mine. pol roger i see a lot of. by chance, we had a magnum of that very wine a week or two ago. but i have seen it on several other occasions as well. sadly, the magnum did not drink as well as it should have. but generally, this is a brilliant wine. 2008 is possibly the best vintage since 1988, if your preference is for classic, elegant, long-lived champers. well cellared bottles will go many years but it is stunning now. and sir W is as good as dom, crystal etc, in its own style. 1
Habana Mike Posted September 17, 2020 Author Posted September 17, 2020 9 hours ago, Ken Gargett said: i don't see much schafer at all here. i am sure that our american friends will have opinions far more worthwhile than mine. pol roger i see a lot of. by chance, we had a magnum of that very wine a week or two ago. but i have seen it on several other occasions as well. sadly, the magnum did not drink as well as it should have. but generally, this is a brilliant wine. 2008 is possibly the best vintage since 1988, if your preference is for classic, elegant, long-lived champers. well cellared bottles will go many years but it is stunning now. and sir W is as good as dom, crystal etc, in its own style. Thanks Ken. We quite enjoyed it!
BrightonCorgi Posted September 17, 2020 Posted September 17, 2020 The Winston Churchill is a winner every vintage it comes out. 2008 is on the young side, no? Epic vintage across the board for '08 Champagne. Shafer is a classic. Never had that vintage, but I bet it was good.
GolfT3 Posted September 18, 2020 Posted September 18, 2020 Have never been let down by Shafer, they seem to make every blend and every vintage work. My experience with Pol Roger has all been with standard NV but always very good. Sounds like you had a good night! 1
bambam Posted August 12, 2021 Posted August 12, 2021 I’ve been on the Shafer hillside list since 2001. I find the SHS drinks best at about 15 years so you are in the right window. The last bottle of ‘06 I had was a long time ago. It is not the best vintage but Shafer never disappoints. I would enjoy it sooner than later.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now