Bolivar Tubo no.1 MUP SEP 13 (BRW)

[nKostyan]

1/3: enveloping receptors taste, sweet and sour woody, slightly tannic indistinct taste. After warming up the cigar, the mineral earthy notes of the taste became discernible. The cigar tastes rancid to me.

2/3: a more primitive fresh earthy taste profile is more clearly established here, in addition to the taste of charcoal and ash. I have nothing against mineral earthy cigars, but this instance is guilty of rancid taste. Other characteristics of the Cigar are not bad: a lot of smoke, medium strength, medium body.

3/3: the smoke is stronger and stronger, but the taste is even more like wood ash and coal.

Conclusion: I smoked recently in Moscow LCDH. The law on the sale of tobacco products allows only singles that have individual packaging with an excise stamp. Therefore, the choice is not large: only a tube or a cardboard pack, everything else is only sealed boxes. Among the small assortment of tubes, I found Bolivar tubos no.1 ULA 2015, the seller said that they are not popular, so you can always buy aged ones. I bought it and smoked it in the LCDH lounge - it was a great cigar with all the charms of Bolivar-strength sweet and sour, wood, fried sunflower seeds. The cigar I smoked today has a dull earthy taste, spoiled by a rancid taste.

Today only 3/5 stars

[PigFish]

... that's too bad! It happens to everyone. Thanks for sharing the experience.

-tP

[anjimj]

I love these. Im dreading the day when I smoke my last one of these. 

[99call]

Sorry to see that you got a bad one,  they are usually so so good.