Recommended Posts

Posted

I've only seen one thread when I did a search, and this was back in 2015, so tell me about them.

How do they compare to the Magnums and #'s?

What kind of flavors would I expect?

Come on fellas, sell these to me.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Posted

From my experience they are a tad harsh and construction issues are reasonably common. I've found the Coronas Major a lot better made and solidly Upmann. Certainly that leathery milk chocolate but with a bit of added bite compared to say, the PC

  • Like 2
Posted

Lots of talk about the Majestics over the years and generally positive. I personally find them to be a great value. Sure, there are better Upmanns right now but they're not bad at all, and at the $90 price point it's hard not to like them. 07-08 Majestics really seem to be smoking phenomenally right now as well. It may be possible to find some from that period at some B & Ms as they are plentiful and not highly sought after.

 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Hutch said:

Mixed filler..."rustic"...not bad, but not really Upmann.

I'm not sure what you mean by "mixed filler" but the Majestic is made from long filler…

Posted

Sharing NSXes assessment. The Majestics can be really great if you pick a good box, but suffer from variable quality. They also do profit from some lay down time.

Of the small Upmanns, I favour the Coronas Minor and Majestics. Would stay clear of Coronas Junior (though I haven't smoked more recent ones) and the Regalias.

  • Like 1
Posted

I frequently smoke this little gem. I think they're pretty damm good, especially at their price point.

Posted

I have a few boxes of these from 2004  and you get a wonderful toasty bread flavor little cream and roasty nuts as well just an amazing stick one of my favorite "cheapos"

Posted

They are ok, good for newbies. I always feel they are missing something when i have smoked one.

Posted

Thanks for the responses guys. Think I'm gonna save my moolah for something else.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Posted
1 hour ago, Hutch said:

 Perhaps claimed to be long filler, but flaky ash and tobacco bits in the mouth says otherwise. HTH !

You must have smoked pre-2002 Majestics… I've never had this problem with the Majestic, Palmas Extra, Super Partagas, Partagas de Luxe or Romeo No.1, all cremas formerly machine made…

  • Like 2
Posted
11 minutes ago, watches_whiskies_cigars said:

For the same price and vitola, I'd get Rafael Gonzalez Perlas instead.

:blink:

Perlas (perla vitola): 102mmX40rg

Majestic (cremas vitola): 140mmX40rg

and the Perlas is cheaper, whether online or in B&M shops…

Posted
46 minutes ago, Smallclub said:

:blink:

Perlas (perla vitola): 102mmX40rg

Majestic (cremas vitola): 140mmX40rg

and the Perlas is cheaper, whether online or in B&M shops…

I stand corrected. Thanks Smallclub. I was thinking only about the ring guage. Between the two, I've always preferred the RG Perlas to the HU Majestic when it comes to taste.

  • Like 1
Posted

The conversation persuaded me to make this my evening smoke.  I'm near the end of my first box and have purchased singles retail on a couple of occasions.  I have been very pleased and will be buying another box soon.  If it were not for the consistency issues others have raised, I would buy five more boxes.

Cigars in this price range are targeted at people without a lot to spend, or people who smoke a lot of cigars and need solid daily smokes.  If you go in expecting it to be consistently as good as HUPC, you might be disappointed.  If I only smoked one cigar per week, I wouldn't consider buying these.   

  • Like 2
Posted
15 hours ago, irratebass said:

Thanks for the responses guys. Think I'm gonna save my moolah for something else.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk
 

Thats what this is all about, everyone has their own tastes, great to hear you enjoyed them :2thumbs:

Posted
The conversation persuaded me to make this my evening smoke.  I'm near the end of my first box and have purchased singles retail on a couple of occasions.  I have been very pleased and will be buying another box soon.  If it were not for the consistency issues others have raised, I would buy five more boxes.

Cigars in this price range are targeted at people without a lot to spend, or people who smoke a lot of cigars and need solid daily smokes.  If you go in expecting it to be consistently as good as HUPC, you might be disappointed.  If I only smoked one cigar per week, I wouldn't consider buying these.   



Thanks bman. I do tend to smoke quite a bit in a day, especially in warmer weather. I was just looking for a good price point, and I haven't bought a box of HUs yet, and these had a nice price, so was asking for some input.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Posted

"haven't bought a box of HUs yet"

you owe it to yourself to get a box of Petit coronas.

then get a box of Corona Majors.

Probably some Half Coronas.

Pretty soon you will be making room for other Upmann items.............Connie 1,No.2,Mag 46.............

  • Like 1
Posted

The Petit Corona stands "head and shoulders" above the rest of the smaller Hupmanns!

JFK was right in ordering 1000 of them before he placed the embargo on Kuba.

Love the ones Rob picks out for his 24:24.

Posted

Yes you are correct.  A Demi Tasse size JFK smoked.  Regardless the "petit Corona" for my money and experience

is much better than the other smaller Hupmanns.  Of course it is only one thought amoung many which is

always subjective.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Community Software by Invision Power Services, Inc.