Recommended Posts

Posted

Thanks for sharing this review, @Çnote. After reading it, I'd say your description of "interesting" is spot on. Definitely respect fellow smokers being willing to put themselves out there and share their personal opinions about a cigar and the flavors they are perceiving. Doing so reveals their biases too, which isn't an easy thing in this judgmental world. So props to the Developing Palates crew for reviewing this cigar and sharing their personal opinions with the world. With that being said...

I have no clue what Aaron is talking about when he describes the flavors of this cigar along the lines of "construction paper" and "cardboard". WTF is he talking about, and please tell me he wasn't into some whacky shit during his teen years. I've tasted some cigars that I would rate as straight up bad, and thought I picked up a hint of cardboard before, but this is a hint I have NEVER picked up with a BR 109. I haven't read Aaron's previous reviews to get any insight into his cigar preferences, but I can only assume that maybe he's more of a pepper bomb/punch you in the face maduro kind of guy. No slight against that in the least, but maybe he's not the guy this cigar is targeting I guess.

Just color me stunned that "construction paper" and "cardboard" would appear in a tasting review of the BR 109. Didn't see that coming...

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Community Software by Invision Power Services, Inc.