N9 Nudie Lonsdale Reviews....I give you permission to smoke one ROTT + win a box of BR 109!

[El Presidente]

13 hours ago, El Niño said:

I called it just a little bit early. Had another inch of good smoking to go, but I'm thoroughly satisfied for the moment. I love this thing after the rest period. 92 points. Can't wait to see how it develops further!

Fantastic review and glad you enjoyed it 

A couple of our own observations. 

1. There hasn't been another Fab5 cigar so far that has evolved more with 30 days acclimatisation. The BR Petit 109 comes in second. 

       2. This cigar has legs baby. She is consistently showing 90-92 points 30 days down with a mix of complexity and at points, surprising power. She is a babe in the woods having been rolled in July/August of this year. Hamlet's blending has been spot on here.

[El Hoze]

Exactly *four weeks rest, she’s a beaut. Will definitely need to go deep on these. 

[JDoughty]

8 hours ago, El Presidente said:

Fantastic review and glad you enjoyed it 

A couple of our own observations. 

1. There hasn't been another Fab5 cigar so far that has evolved more with 30 days acclimatisation. The BR Petit 109 comes in second. 

       2. This cigar has legs baby. She is consistently showing 90-92 points 30 days down with a mix of complexity and at points, surprising power. She is a babe in the woods having been rolled in July/August of this year. Hamlet's blending has been spot on here.

Given how frickin' good it was ROTT, I can't wait for my 30 day date with the other one from the sampler. Instantly ordered a bundle after tasting the first one ROTT. 

[griller]

At the risk of presenting a bit of sycophancy, the 30-days down "rule" is SO valid with this one! Such a different experience ROTT vs some time to rest, and it's not like they're terrible out of the gate. I've already got another in the dry box for this weekend & if it's anything similar to my Wednesday session then going deep.

Looking back, I didn't give a rating to Wednesday's cigar but it hit a solid 92. These are hitting strong out the gate!

[qs210]

Very very solid ROTT. Easy 90 for me. Looking forward to dipping back in in a month.

[ElLoboLoco]

How’s the strength level in these guys?

[qs210]

7 hours ago, ElLoboLoco said:

How’s the strength level in these guys?

Medium for me.

[Chibearsv]

1 hour ago, ElLoboLoco said:

How’s the strength level in these guys?

Starts medium and ramps up to medium strong. 

[griller]

6 hours ago, qs210 said:

Medium for me.

Same with me, and stayed here from start to finish.

[Hoosh]

7 hours ago, ElLoboLoco said:

How’s the strength level in these guys?

Take my statement with a grain of salt because I smoke mostly heavy hitters (JdN Antaños, LFD Double Ligeros, etc) and cigars known to be on the bolder side…and I smoked mine ROTT (tomorrow will be 30 days since), so, the Lonsdale, for me, nicotine wise, was not a strong cigar at all. My exact note was “low+” on strength.

[JDoughty]

2 hours ago, Hoosh said:

Take my statement with a grain of salt because I smoke mostly heavy hitters (JdN Antaños, LFD Double Ligeros, etc) and cigars known to be on the bolder side…and I smoked mine ROTT (tomorrow will be 30 days since), so, the Lonsdale, for me, nicotine wise, was not a strong cigar at all. My exact note was “low+” on strength. 

I enjoy cigars all over the spectrum from light to blow your nose hairs off. I would also consider these light evolving to light-medium towards the end. Elegant, complex and flavorsome with enough body to hold the flavors in structure, but not strong. All delicious retrohale for me. 

[ElLoboLoco]

Thanks all, maybe right around the queen corona range it sounds. They all seem to be within a click or two on the strength o’meter of each other.

 

 

[Hoosh]

I smoked the second Lonsdale this morning, exactly 30 days after the first. This cigar has been in a humidor that holds only a few CC and the other Nudies I own. It was opened only once to remove a CC that I gave out as a “gift.” Also, if you don’t know by now, I smoke almost entirely NC, and I tend to stick with the higher strength, bolder cigars. I am not a flavor chaser, I’m not a big proponent of having to wait years to age and then smoke a cigar to find out if it’s good to my palate, nor do I want to primarily smoke cigars where honey, marshmallows, butterscotch, and the like are the predominant flavors. So, with that grain of salt, here are my thoughts on the two Puro Desnudo Lonsdales (hereafter, N9) I have tried. 
 

9/26

Within a few hours after receiving my fiver, I randomly picked the second cigar from the right in the below photo to smoke ROTT.

It was a nicely rolled cigar that smelled great out of the package. It did have a strange line that ran the entire length of the cigar. I’m unsure what it was from, but I don’t believe it was a singular stem (seen in the third and fourth photos following).

 

 

While collectively the fiver smelled good upon opening, the nose I got of this particular cigar was chicken skin and almonds. The pre-light draw was freshly cut corn kernels and raw zucchini. Smoking through the first third , a creamy nuttiness was most prevalent with a slightly spicy and cooked onion retrohale. There was a nice smoke output when puffing on the cigar, but almost nonexistent when sitting idle. The aroma was very nice.

About halfway through, I began to notice a sweet coffee note on the retrohale. I enjoyed this until the final third, when the cigar became most enjoyable; a slightly buttery and bread forward retrohale dominated the flavors, and for just about the last third, this was predominantly the way I smoked the cigar. A very low strength cigar, even with smoking it this way. The burn was great for its entirety, and well, I don’t feel “cigar aficionado” enough to give it a number, it was a decent break from my normal smoking sessions.

Total smoking time was an hour and a half.

10/26

Thirty days later, I expected to, and did, smoke a somewhat different cigar. The nose was much better - very floral and way more nutty. I’m uncertain if this had anything to do with the way, it was stored with the other particular cigars, or not. In my mind, there has to be at least a possibility. The pre-light draw was vastly different; not vegetal, but rather exactly like I was eating a Girl Scout Thin Mint cookie. As before, the cigar was rolled nicely, and had the same line going the length of the cigar (not as noticeable in these photos).

 

Upon lighting, a super quick whisper of spice and cracker was prevalent, as was a sense of dryness, very different than the creamy mouth feel I had from the first N9; this was minty and dry. Like the first, the smoking aroma was nice. The early retrohale was like eating green peppers wrapped in bread-nice and tasty in my mind. My only real disappointment was that the ash kept dropping off every half to 3/4 of an inch. 

About halfway in the aroma, developed a slight ammonia smell, one that was just in the air, but not on the palate. Here, my remembrance of enjoying the retrohale from the first one kicked in, and I enjoyed flavors of very yeasty bread and a saltiness I hadn’t tasted in the first N9. Again, like the first one, the retrohale was pretty much how I enjoyed the cigar the rest of the way through to the end. There was a slight ammonia  mouth taste almost at the very end, but like the aroma experienced earlier, it went away pretty quickly. And again, like the first N9, the cigar burned perfectly, except for a slightly wonky burn that I felt I had to touch up.

From that point until the very end, seemingly out of nowhere, the flavors outside of the retrohale were coffee and some slight cinnamon. Despite smoking this down till my fingers burned, it, to me, was was a low strength cigar. I purposefully smoked this in the morning without eating to see if I could notice a difference from the previous cigar. 

Total smoking time for this cigar was one hour and forty minutes. 

So, am I rushing out to order more? No. I still have three left and as I mentioned earlier, I’m not an everyday smoking fan of having to purchase cigars and hold onto them for years to experience its potential “greatness.” Compared to most NC cigars I smoke, this waiting period is just a non starter for me. Additionally, I simply like much stronger cigars (nicotine wise). I’m certain I’ll buy more N9s at some point as I did enjoy the different smoke than normal, but in my mind, I’ll just let them age at the Fabrica5 warehouse. I must , however, acknowledge here the nice difference between the N9 ROTT and the N9 after 30 days. It was, in my mind, an improved cigar.

I will hand it to Rob and the crew. It appears to me they’ve created a cigar that is very CC like in a lot of ways; aging appears to be required for them to reach real “greatness” and the flavors that are obvious have clearly been meticulously crafted. Bravo! I enjoy this size RG and wish it were offered in more NC, but apparently such sizes don’t sell well here in the US.

I’m glad I experienced this cigar. It is a nice break from the “palate killers” I’m more akin to smoking. 🙂

[ElLoboLoco]

Nice review, Sir! Well thought out and appreciate your experience on this. 👍🏼