Recommended Posts

Posted
I kind of get bored with them by the final third. But beautiful looking cigars and excellent construction.


This was my exact impression. I’ll take a RASS any day over this.
  • Like 4
Posted
2 hours ago, LizardGizmo said:

This was my exact impression. I’ll take a RASS any day over this.

 

I'm no fan of RASS but they definitely have more character than the RA3 at this point. The RAS and RAG have more complexity as well. So far I would say they missed the mark with this blend. 

Personally I was hoping for a stronger blend more in line with the RASCC or Perfectos ER. Definitely not the case. They've done so well with RA ERs I'm really surprised they kind of missed on this one. 

They are less than $10 in Cuba so as far as value it's pretty good but honestly I think most customs are going to be on par with these. 

The Monte WE and LGC Turquinos are both winners (and I hear the RG CdL is very good) so 3 out of 4 ain't bad I guess. 

  • Like 4
Posted
5 hours ago, NSXCIGAR said:

I'm no fan of RASS but they definitely have more character than the RA3 at this point. The RAS and RAG have more complexity as well. So far I would say they missed the mark with this blend. 

The Monte WE and LGC Turquinos are both winners (and I hear the RG CdL is very good) so 3 out of 4 ain't bad I guess. 

RASS for me is a semi-weekly go-to. Regular rotation for sure. RAS has been consistently disappointing to my palette, and that's since launch. Young boxes, older boxes, just can't win with them. RASCC and RAG are much better, too, like you said.

Haven't had the MWE and just got a box for the podcast of LGC Turquinos, which I'm looking forward to doing. A few friends of mine who only smoke aged stuff can't stop talking about the Turquinos and great they are young.

All in all, it's nice to see a *reasonably* priced, reg. production new entry in the RA line. Maybe they'll improve with time.

  • Like 2
Posted
7 hours ago, Carrie Nation said:

Would any of you have pegged it for an RA if you smoked it without a band? 

It's definitely got RA DNA. As I said it's kind of a brother to the RAS. I've had RAS that are pretty darn close although I would prefer the RAS to these. 

I've also found that they really start out great the first half inch or so and then just kind of trail off into kind of an under medium generic CC. 

  • Like 3

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Community Software by Invision Power Services, Inc.