Recommended Posts

Posted

I'm with you Shlomo. The Connie A has got me good. I love that cigar, but at the same time I am stocking up on Coronas, Petite Coronas and Minutos because I truly think their days are numbered. HSA has shown that for "small" cigars they are moving to short and FAT. There will come a time when they need the leaf that are using on the PC's and Minutos for these newer releases. Cuts are coming . . . bet on it. When 2013 RASCC's are all that's available you can bet HSA has noticed.

My RASCC are both ULA MAY15

Just sayin'...

Posted

...and someone told me once (chastised actually) that the Edmundo Dantes wasn't a Montecristo.

Wonder how this one fits into their theory?

I still can't say with any certainty one way or the other but I don't know how anyone else can be so sure...

Posted

...and someone told me once (chastised actually) that the Edmundo Dantes wasn't a Montecristo.

Wonder how this one fits into their theory?

You're confusing with the Edmundo Dantes MARCA, created for the Mexico Regional Editions. This one is a Montecristo – it's stamped on the box isn't it?

  • Like 1
Posted

You're confusing with the Edmundo Dantes MARCA, created for the Mexico Regional Editions. This one is a Montecristo – it's stamped on the box isn't it?

I was being a little sarcastic and pointing out the irony of putting the name Edmundo Dantes ON a Montecristo box...but yes, it is stamped on the box. nyah.gifjester.gif

Posted

With HSA raising prices, and adding pricey cigars with larger profit margins to their lineup, id be interested to see volume and revenue change over the past 6 or 7 years for cigars that were produced pre BHK.

There has been a big change on the upside for them in both revenue and unit sales.

Keep in mind however that worldwide Cuban cigar sales took a big hit in the three years post 2007-2008 (GFC) when their key European market of Spain collapsed and others took a major hit.

  • Like 1
Posted

There has been a big change on the upside for them in both revenue and unit sales.

Interesting, I had expected that a 4% rise in turnover could've been explained by regular price increases and releasing of more high-price EDs alone. Would be interesting to get to know more on output numbers, unit sales as well as total volume.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Community Software by Invision Power Services, Inc.