Guest Robo Posted September 4, 2012 Posted September 4, 2012 EDICION LIMITADA 2012 PARTAGÁS SERIE C No.3. Habanos S.A presents its second Edición Limitada -limited edition- of 2012. Partagás is the brand selected on this ocassion and it is arriving soon to markets all over the world. http://www.habanos.c...le.aspx?aid=572
Puros Y Vino Posted September 4, 2012 Posted September 4, 2012 EDICION LIMITADA 2012 PARTAGÁS SERIE C No.3. Habanos S.A presents its second Edición Limitada -limited edition- of 2012. Partagás is the brand selected on this ocassion and it is arriving soon to markets all over the world. http://www.habanos.c...le.aspx?aid=572 Great packaging. Similar to the E2 and so far..a much better cigar than it too.
Cohiba Stevie Posted September 4, 2012 Posted September 4, 2012 Looks like a corona gorda. I am definatley interested in these.
TexAg Posted September 4, 2012 Posted September 4, 2012 This and the Monte 520's are on the fast track to my humidor.
mk05 Posted September 4, 2012 Posted September 4, 2012 Great packaging. Similar to the E2 and so far..a much better cigar than it too. No way
tdlfoto Posted September 4, 2012 Posted September 4, 2012 call me crazy but i like the E2. looking forward to this one too!
maverickdrinker Posted September 4, 2012 Posted September 4, 2012 No way I concur...The 2012 EL is better than the E2
Guest Robo Posted September 4, 2012 Posted September 4, 2012 Looks like a corona gorda. I am definatley interested in these. Similar, this is 48 x 5.6", while a coronas gordas is 46 x 5.6".
MIKA27 Posted September 4, 2012 Posted September 4, 2012 call me crazy but i like the E2. looking forward to this one too! Yes, I agree, the E2's have been great for me and as such, I only received my cab of the E2's yesterday! The Partagas C's look amazing, I hear there is more of a chocolate cream profile on those..
Puros Y Vino Posted September 4, 2012 Posted September 4, 2012 I concur... IMO, The E2 doesn't deserve to carry the Partagas name. So underwhelming. Great looking stick, but not befitting of the marca. If it was unbanded, I'd say it was a good, mild cigar. I would never guess it was a Partagas.
Ghabanos Posted September 4, 2012 Posted September 4, 2012 Similar, this is 48 x 5.6", while a coronas gordas is 46 x 5.6". I can work with that.
maverickdrinker Posted September 5, 2012 Posted September 5, 2012 IMO, The E2 doesn't deserve to carry the Partagas name. So underwhelming. Great looking stick, but not befitting of the marca. If it was unbanded, I'd say it was a good, mild cigar. I would never guess it was a Partagas. Corrected my post..
Puros Y Vino Posted September 5, 2012 Posted September 5, 2012 Corrected my post.. I knew you'd see the error of your ways.
Duane Posted September 5, 2012 Posted September 5, 2012 I so should have taken a pic for you all when i was at LCDH he had the serie C aswell but after the problems i hvae had with partys i scared off them.
Rushman Posted September 5, 2012 Posted September 5, 2012 Not interested. I'd like to be but I'm not --- I am here: http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=20.629944,-87.070036
chr0nic Posted September 5, 2012 Posted September 5, 2012 I so should have taken a pic for you all when i was at LCDH he had the serie C aswell but after the problems i hvae had with partys i scared off them. I have a box of these... I'm still relatively new to determining flavours etc. but the one I sampled was nice. I imagine there are photos \ images of them everywhere, but if anyone wants something in particular I am happy to oblige?
mk05 Posted September 5, 2012 Posted September 5, 2012 IMO, The E2 doesn't deserve to carry the Partagas name. So underwhelming. Great looking stick, but not befitting of the marca. If it was unbanded, I'd say it was a good, mild cigar. I would never guess it was a Partagas. I think that would be too early to say. What is Partagas...certain older Partagas are so rich, delicate, and refined in its perfume that it makes LGC taste like Febreze. Another Partagas tastes like sugar canes. And another exuding viscous oils, toast, rich creme, and cedary sweetness, tricking you into thinking it was an Upmann. My point is that Partagas isn't a one trick pony like, say...LGC, Monte, Dips, or PL. There's a lot to the facets of Partagas, three of the many faces to the marca described above. I'm not sure what the E2 does definitively yet, but I'm willing to give it some time. Right now it tastes like a very old refined D4, but who knows what in the future? Furthermore, you guys are saying this fireproof EL wrappered one yr run cigar is more Partagas than a regular production cigar? I respect your thoughts so I have to buy a couple, but man! PS - talk about not indicative of marca for Partagas? What about the P1? What was so Partagas about that? Four jars through and it tastes more like a Hamlet or an HdM PP than a Partagas.
khomeinist Posted September 6, 2012 Posted September 6, 2012 Umm. PL and Monte are not 'one-trick ponies.' Best Regards
Cohiba Stevie Posted September 6, 2012 Posted September 6, 2012 Umm. PL and Monte are not 'one-trick ponies.' Best Regards Montes are without doubt the flattest and most predictable cigar on the market in my opinion.
khomeinist Posted September 7, 2012 Posted September 7, 2012 Had any Especiales? Get back to me on that assessment.....
mk05 Posted September 7, 2012 Posted September 7, 2012 Come on, that's the only Monte worth smoking anyway.
DrunkenMonkey Posted September 9, 2012 Posted September 9, 2012 Come on, that's the only Monte worth smoking anyway. Couldn't disagree more.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now