Recommended Posts

Posted

Idiot for what exactly? For releasing two similar cigars in two different markets, one at each end of the earth, without any interaction between them? What's the problem?

No problem for releasing 2 similar cigars...but surely not at the same time?

Both distributors would have gone to some effort to procure the release. It is a 2 year process. There has always been an element of exclusivity to a Regional Release before another market can apply to pick it up (not much mind you but enough).

Whether it is the French Distributors or PCC does not matter. One of them should have been given a clean run given the size of the cigars are so similar.

Just my opinion.

Posted

It is a 2 year process. There has always been an element of exclusivity to a Regional Release before another market can apply to pick it up (not much mind you but enough).

I get the picture; makes sense. And IMHO (speculation) the offender has to be the french distributor; this company is autistic, they have about zero contact with the french cigar community…

Posted

Does it make any difference that vendors in the Asia/Pacific region can ship orders while (as I understand it)

French vendors cannot legally ship/mail tobacco products?

Just a thought.

.

Posted

Idiot for what exactly? For releasing two similar cigars in two different markets, one at each end of the earth, without any interaction between them? What's the problem?

I'm assuming it's because each region assumes it will receive an exclusive, not a bi-regional addition. Maybe Canada can swing a deal with Antarctica to swing a bi-polar edition...

Edit: sorry, missed the post from the Prez

Posted

Does it make any difference that vendors in the Asia/Pacific region can ship orders while (as I understand it)

French vendors cannot legally ship/mail tobacco products?

Just a thought..

It is not a sales issue.

Why go to the trouble of doing a QD dinner in HK/Shanghai/Bangkok/Sydney/ etal to celebrate this release when every 2nd question from your cigar guests revolves around "is it the same as the French QD release? Has anyone tried the French one? How do they compare? Why 2 releases? Did you know about the French Release?"

Completely unnecessary and unfair to distributors who pay upfront for some exclusivity.

Posted

It is not a sales issue.

Why go to the trouble of doing a QD dinner in HK/Shanghai/Bangkok/Sydney/ etal to celebrate this release when every 2nd question from your cigar guests revolves around "is it the same as the French QD release? Has anyone tried the French one? How do they compare? Why 2 releases? Did you know about the French Release?"

Completely unnecessary and unfair to distributors who pay upfront for some exclusivity.

I agree with Rob, as usual.

By the way, are the price points about the same as well as the marca and vitola? Packaging?

Posted

It is not a sales issue.

Why go to the trouble of doing a QD dinner in HK/Shanghai/Bangkok/Sydney/ etal to celebrate this release when every 2nd question from your cigar guests revolves around "is it the same as the French QD release? Has anyone tried the French one? How do they compare? Why 2 releases? Did you know about the French Release?"

Completely unnecessary and unfair to distributors who pay upfront for some exclusivity.

There is a dinner? How do I get invited?

Posted

It is not a sales issue.

(snip)

Completely unnecessary and unfair to distributors who pay upfront for some exclusivity.

OK. Got it.

It's an exclusivity issue because the two releases, while not the same, are close enough to be seen as the same. It's not like releasing, say, three Por Larranage in one year because those cigars were all very different.

.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Community Software by Invision Power Services, Inc.