OZCUBAN Posted August 12, 2010 Posted August 12, 2010 Two Different Versions.... Two Different Morals OLD VERSION The ant works hard in the withering heat all summer long, building his house and laying up supplies for the winter. The grasshopper thinks the ant is a fool and laughs and dances and plays the summer away.. Come winter, the ant is warm and well fed. The grasshopper has no food or shelter, so he dies out in the cold. MORAL OF THE STORY: Be responsible for yourself! MODERN VERSION The ant works hard in the withering heat and the rain all summer long, building his house and laying up supplies for the winter. The grasshopper thinks the ant is a fool and laughs and dances and plays the summer away. Come winter, the shivering grasshopper calls a press conference and demands to know why the ant should be allowed to be warm and well fed while he is cold and starving. Channels 7, 9 and 10,the ABC and SBS show up to provide pictures of the shivering grasshopper next to a video of the ant in his comfortable home with a table filled with food. Australia is stunned by the sharp contrast. How can this be, that in a country of such wealth, this poor grasshopper is allowed to suffer so? Kermit the Frog appears on Oprah with the grasshopper and everybody cries when they sing, 'It's Not Easy Being Green.' Acorn stages a demonstration in front of the ant's house where the news stations film the group singing, 'We shall overcome.' Cardinal George Pell then has the group kneel down to pray to God for the grasshopper's sake. Prime Minister Gillard condemns the ant and blames John Howard, Robert Menzies, Capt James Cook, and the Pope for the grasshopper's plight. Bob Brown exclaims in an interview on Today Tonight that the ant has gotten rich off the back of the grasshopper, and calls for an immediate tax hike on the ant to make him pay his fair share. Finally, Labor in conjunction with the Greens draft the Economic Equity & Anti-Grasshopper Act retroactive to the beginning of the summer. The ant is fined for failing to hire a proportionate number of green bugs and, having nothing left to pay his retroactive taxes, his home is confiscated by the Government and given to the grasshopper. The story ends as we see the grasshopper and his free-loading friends finishing up the last bits of the ant’s food while the government house he is in, which, as you recall, just happens to be the ant's old house, crumbles around them because the grasshopper doesn't maintain it. The ant has disappeared in the snow, never to be seen again. The grasshopper is found dead in a drug related incident, and the house, now abandoned, is taken over by a gang of spiders who terrorize the ramshackle, once prosperous and once peaceful, neighbourhood. MORAL OF THE STORY: Be careful how you vote in 2010. I’ve sent this to you because I believe that you are an ant – not a grasshopper! Make sure that you pass this on to other ants. Don’t bother sending it on to any grasshoppers because they wouldn’t understand it, anyway.
MIKA27 Posted August 12, 2010 Posted August 12, 2010 Well said Steve. The last paragraph where the spiders overtake the home, you weren't talking about Kens place were you? Both politicians however IMO suck!!
CanuckSARTech Posted August 12, 2010 Posted August 12, 2010 Seen this in many different versions, floating around the 'net a number of years ago. Me? I'm a wolf spider, in sheep ant's clothing - someone needs to keep all the other buggies away, so the ants can live in peace.
zuma Posted August 12, 2010 Posted August 12, 2010 Unfortunately, Tony Abott is scared of all types of insects (specially ants) and was last spotted with a can of Mortein spraying around his neigbourhood. The greens were also last seen trying to develop cannibalistic behaviours in both ants and grasshoppers. Moral of the story: Polititians are no messiahs, they will divide society for a vote. However, vote and bear some guilt like any responsible citizen... if you don't vote, don't bloody whinge and blame others!
Wil Posted August 13, 2010 Posted August 13, 2010 Hear that poor people? Just get off your arse and be more like James Packer! Stop being frivolous! And to the billions of people living in poverty, get off your arse!
Wil Posted August 13, 2010 Posted August 13, 2010 And you're kidding yourselves if you think there's any great difference between Abbott and Gillard (Liberal/Labor). One just happens to be a hell of a lot dumber than the other. Just an opinion
MIKA27 Posted August 13, 2010 Posted August 13, 2010 And you're kidding yourselves if you think there's any great difference between Abbott and Gillard (Liberal/Labor). One just happens to be a hell of a lot dumber than the other.Just an opinion An opinion I agree with wholeheartedly.
Ken Gargett Posted August 13, 2010 Posted August 13, 2010 And you're kidding yourselves if you think there's any great difference between Abbott and Gillard (Liberal/Labor). One just happens to be a hell of a lot dumber than the other.Just an opinion i'm really struggling to work out which is dumber. and to be honest, i'd rather vote for an ant or a grasshopper than either of these two. and having finally seen the end of the 'fairies at the bottom of the garden' party, the morons called the australian democrats, we now have the greens as an alternative. one would think this not a bad thing but we have one of their number (and this bloke and his party have put him up as a viable potential member of parliament - lord spare us) claiming 9-11 to be an inside job and that the bombs were planted and the planes never hit the place (or some such rubbish). you would think that any political party worth two cents would have dumped the imbecile immediately. not the greens. provided he said that these were his views and not those of the party, all is well. they want him to represent australians. informal looking good. it is beyond me how the human race has survived this long.
ARRV Posted August 13, 2010 Posted August 13, 2010 i'm really struggling to work out which is dumber. and to be honest, i'd rather vote for an ant or a grasshopper than either of these two. and having finally seen the end of the 'fairies at the bottom of the garden' party, the morons called the australian democrats, we now have the greens as an alternative. one would think this not a bad thing but we have one of their number (and this bloke and his party have put him up as a viable potential member of parliament - lord spare us) claiming 9-11 to be an inside job and that the bombs were planted and the planes never hit the place (or some such rubbish). you would think that any political party worth two cents would have dumped the imbecile immediately. not the greens. provided he said that these were his views and not those of the party, all is well. they want him to represent australians. informal looking good. it is beyond me how the human race has survived this long. I think this is possibly the worst ever choice offered to the Australian public in an election in the history of this Commonwealth. Seriously considering informal if I get to the ballot box. Seriously considering not going at all and simply paying the fine for not voting. What's the point.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now