Montecristo Grand Edmundo MOA FEB 10

[Colt45]

also, the point colt raises was one i have been intending to raise for a while. how accurate is the date stamp? given the somewhat haphazard approach to certain matters in cuba, how can we be sure that these were not rolled a year ago hand have been sitting there waiting to be boxed?

I suppose dates are especially relevant to those who might like to keep track of overall yearly crop quality. With the current 3-2-1 aged tobacco system

supposedly in effect, having cigars that have been in storage for a time, then date stamped at boxing could throw that out of kilter - not that I know if

many or any of us really track vintages.

[Habanakane21]

good luck with that. it will be a cold day in hell before they disgrace my balcony.

I Love It...Ken has high standard!!!!

[Benzopyrene]

Great review! Really enjoyed your take on that, and makes me want to pick up a couple to try that's for sure. Cheers!

[frenchkiwi]

hmm... thanks for the review - your description makes me think of a Cohiba Genios or some such...

obviously very early days, but how would you compare this to a Genios or MC Sublimes?

[Ken Gargett]

hmm... thanks for the review - your description makes me think of a Cohiba Genios or some such...

obviously very early days, but how would you compare this to a Genios or MC Sublimes?

for me, and granted on the basis of only one cigar, not in the ball park. as i said in the post above, anyone thinking they are getting another monte siblimes is going to be very disappointed. but clearly others have had much more enjoyable experiences.

[El Presidente]

Have now had 4 from different boxes. 91/90/88/89

All FEB/MAR 10.

I prefer them to the Monte Sublime (at this stage) because of a cleaner flavour. There is a long way to go with these cigars. Let's see how they perform around Christmas.

[Duxnutz]

Any recent comment on these?

[maverickdrinker]

They are coming alonr really well...