Colt45 Posted May 30, 2007 Posted May 30, 2007 Sorry guys, no codes - As it was pre-'06, and earlier were long gone, I'll say '05. Great construction, a medium brown wrapper with the slightest red tinge and quite the sheen. Draw, burn, and smoke volume all perfect. A dark, full bodied cigar. Early hints of browned butter, but the overwhelming flavor was of sweetly earthy, deep rich tobacco. A one time blast of salt right at the halfway point, becoming lightly peppery near the end. Not very complex, but deeply satisfying in the way of a perfectly grilled steak with a side of seared tuna. In my opinion, a long way to go before reaching full potential. Great cigar. I'd love to hear any comments on '06s.
Mel Posted May 30, 2007 Posted May 30, 2007 Hello Colt I do have a cab of the 06 and I'm on them. Some may say they are to young to smoke but if I like them then it's a done deal. Very full bodied bold smoke with flavors of burnt caramel and earth. They draw and burn very well and I have had another cab set back at the Czar house. Lisa knows I liike these and lets me know when they are available.
Quint Posted May 30, 2007 Posted May 30, 2007 I like the 06's quite a bit even though they obviuosly need time they are smoking great right now. One of the better "out of the box" smokes I've had from 06. FYI That blast of salt 1/2 way through was that little nest of beetle eggs hiding there.......LOL
shrink Posted May 30, 2007 Posted May 30, 2007 The '01s I've sampled have been among the best PC's I've ever smoked. Right up there with aged Bolivars and Punch, IMO. I only smoked one from my early '06 box, but it really impressed me with its strength and potential. Since I don't have any aged ones, I'm hoping to have the patience to leave 'em alone for at least another couple years. Hmmm... maybe I'll get another box. :-)
El Presidente Posted May 30, 2007 Posted May 30, 2007 06's have been great. Rich lush cigars of the highest order. Nice caramel core on some. Will age superbly. Will try an 07 shortly.
Ken Gargett Posted May 30, 2007 Posted May 30, 2007 colt, got a cab of '05s from rob (remember him saying they looked like the best he'd ever seen - i bet he says that to all the boys). back then, split 20 for smoking over the next few years and 30 for deep storage. the 20 were so good they lasted about 8 days. have kept fingers off the rest, been tough, but can't wait.
Colt45 Posted May 31, 2007 Author Posted May 31, 2007 Thanks for the response, guys. The first from this batch of singles, tried a year+ ago, was nice, with the caramel notes often associated with this cigar. They quickly shut down, as the next couple were rather sharp and disjointed. This latest has come back with a vengeance. Of course, I now only have a few singles left, and will have to start the process over again Carlos, my camera does not have macro capability, but I'll try in the future.
Well Armed Posted May 31, 2007 Posted May 31, 2007 » Will try an 07 shortly. Yes please do. And then smoke an '06 back-to-back for the best comparison!
El Presidente Posted June 1, 2007 Posted June 1, 2007 » colt, got a cab of '05s from rob (remember him saying they looked like the » best he'd ever seen - i bet he says that to all the boys). back then, » split 20 for smoking over the next few years and 30 for deep storage. the » 20 were so good they lasted about 8 days. have kept fingers off the rest, » been tough, but can't wait. So what you are saying Ken.......is I WAS RIGHT :-D
shrink Posted June 1, 2007 Posted June 1, 2007 So what you are saying Ken.......is I WAS RIGHT :-D (In my best Ken impersonation) "No, what I said was that even a broken clock is correct twice a day."
Mike33 Posted June 1, 2007 Posted June 1, 2007 Nice Review! My cab from '06 is from April I believe. They were just "so-so" when I first started smoking 'em. I had one a couple of weeks ago and it was very good. Rich, complex, and quite a bit of power. It will be tough to keep my hands off them!
Ken Gargett Posted June 1, 2007 Posted June 1, 2007 » So what you are saying Ken.......is I WAS RIGHT :-D » » (In my best Ken impersonation) » » "No, what I said was that even a broken clock is correct twice a day." to be fair, all it really means is that you can't fight the law of averages all your life.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now