Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, Huckleberry said:

What year?

It's in the title of the post my friend.

5 years should be great age for this cigar.  Not typical to be that mild.  Hopefully just a fluke.

  • Like 2
Posted
22 hours ago, Monterey said:

It's in the title of the post my friend.

5 years should be great age for this cigar.  Not typical to be that mild.  Hopefully just a fluke.

No crap, it is in the title of the post.  It must have been late because I don't drink anymore.  It is always in the title of the post :)  My apologies...

I don't find them to become more mild at that point.  My thoughts are that the body or mild nature of these cigars doesn't transition much with age.  While young they just aren't as refined, and the complexity or nuances are all over the place, more schizoprhenic if you will.  Kind of like a grade school orchestra versus the real professional orchestra, the instruments present are the same, one of those groups is just way more refined in its performance--if that makes sense.

They are honestly one of my favorite cigars, and one that almost has an underground following, like in my opinion they are too good to not be talked about more.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Community Software by Invision Power Services, Inc.