El Presidente Posted March 17, 2015 Posted March 17, 2015 yep, did not have a clue (even after reviewing the thing). that is because you are generally "Clueless"
Ken Gargett Posted March 17, 2015 Posted March 17, 2015 that is because you are generally "Clueless" seriously? if we are all quiet for a moment, we'll hear the sound of thin ice cracking away under the prez.
subiemech Posted March 17, 2015 Posted March 17, 2015 seriously? if we are all quiet for a moment, we'll hear the sound of thin ice cracking away under the prez. If you get off his back maybe you wont fall through
Ken Gargett Posted March 17, 2015 Posted March 17, 2015 If you get off his back maybe you wont fall through that is like saying one less passenger on the titanic would have saved it!! 1
Overproof Posted March 17, 2015 Posted March 17, 2015 Something happened to the Titanic? No. Clive Palmer's got it
LordAnubis Posted March 17, 2015 Posted March 17, 2015 Mus, please tell me how you arrived at your opinion. I'm not disagreeing with you,just curious why? The two I have tried were reasonably full flavoured but quite well balanced. There was no harshness no "youth" that I detected. I didn't detect any flavours that were lingering in the background waiting to come out. I think if these sit for more than 3 years I think they'll lose more than they gain. It already has nice flavours, and good progression through the cigar. I don't think age will change the profile or bring out any more than it already has. But, i'm not really an aged cigar fan to be honest, I like some roughness in a cigar. 1
TheGingercon Posted March 22, 2015 Posted March 22, 2015 I got half a box and plan on having one a year for the next 5 years. Best birthday's ever.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now