Will Cuban oil lubricate US Cuba relations?

Recommended Posts


Will Cuban oil lubricate US Cuba relations?

For decades, the only promise most Cubans saw in the ocean north of their island was the current that carries homemade rafts to Florida. That all changed a few years ago when geologists estimated that between 5 billion bbl. and 10 billion bbl. of oil lie beneath the waters off Cuba’s northwest coast. Suddenly it seemed as though the hemisphere’s sole communist nation might finally end its desperate dependence on oil-rich allies like the former Soviet Union and Venezuela — and perhaps even escape its impoverished economic time warp altogether.

Washington’s own Cuba time warp got a jolt as well. The oil discovery has renewed debate over whether a crude-thirsty U.S. should loosen its 46-year-old trade embargo against Cuba and let yanqui firms join the drilling, which is taking place fewer than 100 miles off U.S. shores. Despite the Bush Administration’s hard line on Cuba, Republicans in Congress have proposed legislation to exempt Big Oil from the embargo. That clamor is sure to rise — especially if Barack Obama, who is more open to dialogue with Havana, becomes the next President — now that Cuba’s state oil company, Cubapetroleo, or Cupet, has announced a stunning new estimate of more than 20 billion bbl. bubbling off its shores. “This is not a game,” Cupet’s exploration manager, Rafael Tenreyro, assured reporters in Havana last week.

If true, those potential reserves could make Cuba a major petro player in the hemisphere. (The U.S. has reserves of 29 billion bbl.) And it could render the embargo an even more ineffective means of dislodging the aging Castro brothers, Fidel and current President Raúl. “If it really is 20 billion, then it’s a game changer,” says Jonathan Benjamin-Alvarado, a Cuba oil analyst at the University of Nebraska-Omaha. “It provides a lot more justification for changing elements of the embargo, just as we did when we allowed agricultural and medical sales to Cuba” a decade ago.

But is the Cuban calculation really on the level? Skeptics ask if the 20-billion-bbl. estimate is just a ploy to rekindle investor interest, at a time when falling oil prices could make the maritime find less attractive to the potential international partners Cuba needs to extract the oil. The effort is all the more urgent, they add, because reduced oil revenues could also make friends like left-wing Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez less able to aid Cuba with cut-rate crude shipments and capital to improve the island’s aged refineries. “The Cuba numbers from my point of view are not valid,” says Jorge Pinon, an energy fellow at the University of Miami and an expert on Cuba’s oil business. “I think they’re feeling a lot of pressure right now to accelerate the development of their own oil resources.” Benjamin-Alvarado gives Cuba’s geologists more benefit of the doubt; but he calls the 20-billion-bbl. estimate “off the charts.” “I trust them as oil people, and their seismic readings might be right,” he says, “but until we see secondary, outside analysis, this is going to be suspect.”

The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), a government agency, made the initial estimate of 5 billion bbl.to 10 billion bbl. for Cuba’s northwest offshore sector (known as the Exclusive Economic Zone, or EEZ) in 2004. Tenreyro says Cupet’s analysis is based on what he calls a more accurate comparison of similar maritime oil fields like those off Mexico’s Gulf Coast. “We’re talking about that magnitude,” he argued last week. “We have more data” than the USGS. But Cupet, an arm of Cuba’s ultra-secret communist government, hasn’t offered much more evidence than that. Chris Schenk, who as USGS coordinator in the Caribbean led the 2004 survey, agrees that Cuban geologists “are very good.” But he adds, “We would like to see more data.” Still, Schenk notes, because of the embargo and Havana’s insular information policies, “we can’t converse with the Cubans.”

The Spanish energy company Repsol-YPF has entered into a production-sharing agreement with Cupet and is scheduled to start drilling the first real well in the EEZ next year. Other international firms, including Norway’s StatoilHidro and India’s Oil & Natural Gas Corp., are part of the Repsol-led consortium. Venezuela’s state-run Petroleos de Venezuela is considered a lesser player because it has little deep-water drilling experience. (China is also interested but so far only involved in onshore drilling in Cuba.) Cuba is now in important negotiations with Brazil’s Petrobras, which just made its own multibillion-barrel oil find off its coast near Rio de Janeiro and could, analysts say, be the major offshore drilling partner for Cuba if it jumps in.

Still, the concessions so far represent less than a quarter of the 59 drilling blocks that Cuba hopes to exploit in the 43,000-sq.-mi. (112,000 sq km) EEZ. Analysts say one reason is the daunting infrastructural difficulties facing any company that drills in Cuba: firms have to bring much more of their own capital, equipment, technology and on-the-ground know-how than usual. This year’s severe hurricane damage in Cuba has made the situation worse. Canada’s Sherritt, in fact, recently dropped out of its four-block contract. “Who else is going to be willing to actually come in and take the risk in Cuba?” says Benjamin-Alvarado. “In terms of proximity and technology, the only people really able to do it to the extent the Cubans need are the Americans.”

Cuba now produces about 60,000 barrels of oil per day (BPD) and consumes more than 150,000 BPD. (It also produces natural gas.) Venezuela makes up the difference by shipping almost 100,000 BPD to Cuba. The University of Miami’s Pinon says the more serious issue is refining capacity: even if Cuba has only the low estimate of 5 billion bbl. — which could yield more than 300,000 BPD — it needs Venezuela’s investment to upgrade refineries like the Soviet-built plant at Cienfuegos. But plummeting crude prices mean that Chávez may have a lot less wealth to spread around for his petro-diplomacy projects. “Like the collapse of the Soviet Union,” says Pinon, “this kind of thing has always been Cuba’s Achilles’ heel.”

If Cuba really does have 20 billion bbl. to drill, however, it could more easily find other interested refinery investors, like Brazil. The question is whether the U.S. will want to step off the sidelines and get a piece of the action too. Kirby Jones, head of the U.S.-Cuba Trade Association and an embargo opponent, says Tenreyro’s staff has been credible in the past, and he believes the new estimate is probably accurate. “So for the U.S., this becomes an 800-lb. guerrilla knocking on everybody’s door,” says Jones. “With that much oil, there would be the feeling that there’s a real [u.S.] price to be paid for [maintaining] the embargo. It changes Cuba’s economic situation drastically and makes the U.S. less relevant.”

Perhaps, but in the short run it’s more likely to make the U.S. more determined to do its own offshore drilling. Vice President **** Cheney and other Bush Administration officials point to Cuba’s petro fortunes as justification for opening more of America’s coastline to oil production. Recent polls in U.S. coastal states like Florida support that idea, despite environmentalist complaints that both U.S. and Cuban offshore rigs will foul the Gulf of Mexico. Meanwhile, embargo proponents on Capitol Hill have sponsored bills that would, among other sanctions, deny visas to the executives of foreign oil companies that drill oil in Cuba. Their reasoning: the more oil wealth Havana gains, the less incentive it has to pursue democratic reform.

That last part may well be true. But at the end of the day, U.S.-Cuba relations continue to exist in a Cold War time warp. As a result, in both Washington and Havana, 20 billion bbl. of oil might not be such a game changer after all.

— With reporting by Dolly Mascarenas / Mexico City

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The near future here in the US will be a telling time on many subjects. The Cuban Oil find will be a windfall yet until outside Capital is found the reality of capturing this projected wealth is not going to be realized in my humble opinion. While oil is needed currently, it has become crystal clear that alternative energy is going to be the focus and oil is strictly the stop gap. I believe that we will see offshore drilling for oil along the Florida Coast sooner than many think. The Cuban Oil Fields are to my knowledge not strictly confined to physical geography of Cuba. This in my opinion is going to be a major factor in ending the Cuban Embargo, which should have ended 45+ years ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As with many islands in the region, the poverty is my first concern. Even if it doesn't change the US embargo, I sincerely hope the updated estimates are legitimate and that Cuba can develop some more industry based on the reserves.

I suspect that the find will eventually help to patch up relations ... business concerns can and will drive our foreign policy as much as political ones. But as with anything else, it will take time. I'll watch and wait, but I suspect that the next few years will change the status quo plenty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

» While oil is needed currently, it has become crystal

» clear that alternative energy is going to be the focus and oil is strictly

» the stop gap.


We need to stop burning all fossil fuels asap. We should have learned this lesson during

the late 70s embargo. Hopefully, no matter where oil is found, and/or how cheap it may

once again become, we'll never fall into the same pattern.

Nothing would make me happier than to never have to burn another drop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

» BINGO!!!


» We need to stop burning all fossil fuels asap. We should have learned

» this lesson during

» the late 70s embargo. Hopefully, no matter where oil is found, and/or how

» cheap it may

» once again become, we'll never fall into the same pattern.


» Nothing would make me happier than to never have to burn another drop.

I am with you Colt. Alternatives need to be the focus this century. Lets have a global index that counts ie one being where our global reliance on oil is shown with sperate indexes for each country.

For every 5% decrease in a country's index let there be a 2% decrease in export tarrifs for that country. Three Tiers of Import Tarrif.

G20 Countries 30%

Developing 20%

Basketcases 15%

You can start with all countries at 100% on the ORI (Oil Reliance Index) as of 31/12/08. Annual reporting.

Global Independent Commission details the rules of the game as well as independent reporting.

Any country increasing 1% on the ORI has 5% tarrif added to their Exports as at the 1st of January each year.

That took about 5 minutes to come up with but makes about as much sense as anything else I have seen over the last month :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Community Software by Invision Power Services, Inc.