Recommended Posts

Posted

Thank you for sharing. This kind of work can be useful indeed.

Tracking how volatiles change through heat/pyrolysis into smoke can help manufacturers compare batches and troubleshoot process variables (curing/fermentation/aging) with more precision. It's best as chemical QA / process insight, probably not so much as "understanding the sensory experiences that drive consumer preference":
1. a chromatograph doesn’t retrohale. Even with a human at a sniff port, you’re still smelling isolated peaks in an analytical context. A cigar experience is the brain integrating retronasal aroma + taste + tactile/mouthfeel + temperature + cadence as a minimum. So molecular level findings can support evaluation, but they don’t replace human sensory evaluation.
2. "Quality” is not a list of molecules presence. At best, you can say: “these markers correlate with these aroma families under these conditions.” But cigar “quality” in the consumer sense is also (crucially) preference alignment. And for that you need measured human sensory data.

  • Thanks 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Community Software by Invision Power Services, Inc.