polarbear Posted July 13, 2013 Share Posted July 13, 2013 Really? Personally, I think the changes to how the party leader is chosen is a good thing. Don't forget, this is how we ended up with Gillard in the first place. True The down side of the 50/50 approach is that you could (in theory) end up with a leader that the ministers dont want and that would destabilize the party further Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fuzz Posted July 13, 2013 Share Posted July 13, 2013 True The down side of the 50/50 approach is that you could (in theory) end up with a leader that the ministers dont want and that would destabilize the party further Difference is, by giving the party an equal vote, the will of the greater constituency is excercised (hopefully). I know of no-one who wants power brokers deciding who should be the party leader. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.15b5f6bc4159a73805a9f118f79a68ca.png)
.png.b3f36db1fa6419bcbd6e13572153fd45.png)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now