» » » Ok I'll be different
» »
» » 2002
» » 1998
» » 2003
» » 2001
» » 1999
» » 2000
» » 1997
» »
» » I have very little in the way of 04-06 that I have actually smoked yet.
» »
» » IMO 1997 was an atrocious year. The only saving grace is that they are
» » well aged. I have no doubt that the 02-03 will blow the '97s away when
» » they have 9 yrs. on them. 1999-2000 are coming along and are IMO
» already
» » better than the '97s for many vitolas.
»
» That is an interesting assessment Elric. I know Habanos does not rate 1997
» or 98 as great years. 99 to them was a disaster. 2001 was their first
» "comeback" year.
I've had a bunch of '99s from various brands and have found them to be MUCH better than the prevailing opinions. As for construction I have found it to be OK. I do prefer 40-46 rings and have had some issues with part Sel. Privadas but everything else has been fine. I might just be lucky. I stand by what I posted: The 97s are good because of the age. The 98 are outstanding in those vitolas I'm partial to(SdC #1, Trini, SW...)