Colt45 Posted October 22, 2006 Share Posted October 22, 2006 Singles, no codes Construction: Very good - firm, but not too heavy. Wrapper: Medium colorado. smooth, with a nice sheen - very nice overall. Draw: Perfect - firm, but consistent and deliberate. Taste: Started with salty spice and honey sweetness. Hints of supple leather and mocha. Light clean tobacco is a core element. At this point, on the light side of medium in body. At the halfway mark, supple leather becomes more dominant, but the sweetness and salty spice remain underlying. A couple of draws bring stewed fruit and bitter chocolate. Becomes fully medium in body. With a third remaining, it became quite herbal, and somewhat bitter, though not harsh. I laid it down at this point. Overall, an absolutely fantastic cigar, and a fantastic size. It drops down to a 92 due to the finish. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bassman Posted October 22, 2006 Share Posted October 22, 2006 One of the most inconsistant cigars I've smoked. I've had them ranging from bland to full flavored. Haven't bought an in a while because I never know which version will show up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Presidente Posted October 24, 2006 Share Posted October 24, 2006 Nice review Ross I suspect the singles have some age on them only because they are not cigars which fly off the shelves. I liken them very much to the La Gloria Cubana Tainos in that they are a cigar which falls apart on the back third with a tardy, dirty, bitter finish. Up to that point you would want to buy box fulls. I would love to try a 2006 version of these and see how they perform in a taste test. If I can locate a box of 06 I will shoot you one through to try and we can do side by side tastings. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cigardawg Posted October 24, 2006 Share Posted October 24, 2006 Great review! I really enjoy the Bolivar Inmensas, but I do consider it a "soft" bolivar. The basic profile is there, but it is quite delicate and refined. At least this is true in an aged (9 years) specimen. The '97s that I am currently smoking from are very nice. I have a box of '05s that I have yet to break. For a couple of reasons...I think the '97s have more or less peaked and I am smoking them now. The other is that I typically do not like young bolivars. I may have to try one just to get a baseline. Thanks for the review on a cigar that most do not hear much about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tampa1257 Posted October 24, 2006 Share Posted October 24, 2006 To be honest, the only Bolivar Inmensas that I have smoked have been 97's and I loved the cigar. It does display the rich earth and sweet Bolivar spice and the depth of complexity in my opinion make it a sought after cigar. I have no clue what newer production would bring to the table, it could be interesting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colt45 Posted October 24, 2006 Author Share Posted October 24, 2006 Bassman, this was my first sample of this cigar, so I can't comment on the consistency aspect, but I do hope my next is as good - or better! The rest of you guys have summed it all up perfectly - thanks for the input. I have one more to try, but can this one on the box list. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now