H. Upmann Connoisseur Number 2   

27 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

Posted

This series to explore whether a particular cigar is humidor worthy. Cost these days is an issue for many so let's see if we can highlight some absolute standouts. This should particularly assist those new to the cigar world.  

To be fair, most of the cigars we have featured to date have scored exceptionally well. Surprisingly well! 

Scoring is: 1-3 (Poor)   4-6 (Average to good)   7-10  (very good to excellent)  Use the Poll. 

The H. Upmann Connoisseur Number 2 is a 51 × 134 mm (5¼″) Robusto released in 2021. 

I am a fan of the Connie 2. To me it has a touch more mongrel than all bar the Magnum 46, but it does lack the complexity you will find with so many others in the H. Upmann brand. Now, to be fair, they are only now coming on 5 years of age so it will be interesting to see how the original releases have come along. Generally, a Connoisseur Number 1 at 5 years is a glorious cigar. It is complex with a capital "C". I can't say the same with the Connie 2 at this stage. Just my opinion so I would love members input. 

H. Upmann Connossieur Number 2. Let's kick off the discussion!  :party:

 

H. Upmann Connoisseur Number 2 PSP DEC 21.jpg

  • Like 1
  • JohnS changed the title to Beneath The Band: H. Upmann Connossieur Number 2
Posted

These cigars are box worthy for me and one of my favorite regular production cigars. I have had boxes form GEM June 2022 and GRB February 2023 which were very good with flavors of shortbread, cream, nuts and spices when young. I just had one from my EPO August 2024 box and it was good but needs another year before I really dig in. Construction is very reliable, strength is medium/full, and the size is good.  

  • Like 2
Posted

Can’t add anything of substance here. Late to the party I’ve been with the Connie2. Remember a vid from the virtual launch “party” in Berlin (Covid-19 times…), where the main descriptor was “mild”. As such, and between the lines, not immediately appealing or exciting to me (perhaps in part due to the “enthusiasm” of the attendees 😅). Haven’t had much so far beyond a very few decent singles, young but showing potential for development. Some boxes aging away. Keen to hear of early adopter’s experiences, as well.

  • Like 4
Posted

I must have had a dozen of those and I quite enjoyed them fresh, I never gave them the chance to age.

That being said, they somehow lacked the Upmann depth I love in Connie 1s, Mag46s , Mag50s and Upmann N°2s, add the fact that we CC smokers need to be pickier as time goes by, they're not a priority to me.

I'd grab a handful if I came across a beautiful box though.

  • Like 4
Posted

Same. One of the few Cubans that held it's ground young at the 6 month mark, but weren't very good between years 1 and 2 (same with JL 2s). I have a June '23 box smoking really well. I love Mag 54s and Connie 2s to me are like Mag 54 Lights. Not as good, but better than average. They're smoking better than the Oct 23 BBFs I have which seems disappointing.

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Community Software by Invision Power Services, Inc.