My first Behike 52 and over all a 3 cigar day

[nick17]

Today I was able to try mt first Cohiba Behike 52 (due to the high price of a single stick here in the Toronto Canada)

the BHK 52 was the first cigar of three (BHK 52, montecristo open regata & a Cuaba Divinos)

The BHK was amazing off the light how ever after the first third it quickly became a huge disappointment the flavors doped off rapidly and they became almost as if i was smoking a block of coal, it picked up slightly again then dropped off. I don't know if this is common with the BHK 2 but i loved the first third and a bit of it but after that it was nothing special at all

montecristo open regata: yes I know a lot of you will laugh at this cigar but i find it a decent cigar for any time of day but best suited for morning. this is the second regata i have smoked or well rather attempted to smoke this weekend the first the draw was so tight even after I drilled the cigar to help open it up I quickly gave up on that cigar and tossed it in the garbage today i smoked another with my friend the draw was again tight but as i smoked it opened right up my friends was a perfect draw, I feel that the consistency of the ragata is rather poor as this is the third dud out of the box of 20. I have 12 left i will see how the rest go.

Cuaba Divinos: this is the second divinos i have ever smoked i picked up three singles late last year i smoked one and found it was way to full bodied for me at the time, after several month of aging it seems to have mellowed out i was able to smoke about three quarters of it before it got to hot it had a rely strong woody flavor to it with hints of leather. it was far from my favorite cigar and most likely wont buy any more

[maverickdrinker]

sorry to hear that the BHK 52 was disappointing for you. Hopefully, it was just a bad stick.

I find them to be a cohiba on steroids. Very pronounced flavours. Maybe try another one to see?

The monte opens are a good morning coffee cigar as it is very light in flavor profile.

Thanks for the reviews.

[#2 man]

Thanks for the review. Great picture!

[jnt]

What B&M did you get it from?

[thechenman]

Sorry to hear about your BHK experience. the 52 didn't work out, but give the 54 and 56 a try before you give up on them.

[nick17]

It was an amazing cigar for the first third I was taken back by it but soon there after I was almost willing to to it down about half way through the stick. I definitely think that it was a bad stick and the next time i have that kind of money to send on a single cigar i think I will be buying a 54 & I have not given up on the BHK line what so ever.

Oh and I for got to add this in the original post but I was drinking Pol Roger Champagne with the last two cigars

and glad you all liked the review I think i will be doing a revue of the PSD4 and something else Cuban this weekend

[nick17]

sorry to hear that the BHK 52 was disappointing for you. Hopefully, it was just a bad stick.

I find them to be a cohiba on steroids. Very pronounced flavours. Maybe try another one to see?

The monte opens are a good morning coffee cigar as it is very light in flavor profile.

Thanks for the reviews.

I agree it is a Cohiba on steroids i loved the complexity while it lasted...

and it definitively is