Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'Petit No. 2 review'.

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Blogs

  • FOHrensics
  • FOHcus
  • FOH.tv

Forums

  • Friends Of el Habano
    • FOH Forum Rules
    • Cigars Discussion Forum "the water hole"
    • The Cauldron
    • ReFOHrence
    • FOHrensics: Case Files
    • From The Sports Desk
    • Charity Fundraiser Forum
    • Cuba Travel Forum
    • Hand Picked Cigars and Samplers
    • FOH Competitions
    • Newbie Introductions
    • Cigar Reviews
    • Wine Beer Spirits
    • Fishing
    • Food
    • Arts
    • "Cheap & Cheerful"
    • Suspect Cigar Forum
    • Humidors
    • Classic Posts
    • Global Cigar Friendly Locations
    • Punch Joe Forum
    • Friends of Habanos Photo Gallery
    • Chuck "Tampa" Tribute Forum
    • Forum Technical Issues
    • Comedy Central
  • Hot Box Picture Forum
  • HQ (High Quality) Selections
  • Premium Select Program
  • Premium Economy
  • Aged Selections

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


AIM


MSN


Website URL


ICQ


Yahoo


Jabber


Skype


Location


Interests

Found 1 result

  1. I got one of these at the festival last February and decided to light it up last night, given the news of their release. I weighed it first, out of interest. At 10 grammes, it's 2/3 the weight of the No. 2. It's about 30 mm shorter than the Monte 2, 5 mm shorter than the Partagas P1. Very nice wrapper feel. oily and smooth. I don't cut much off piramides but this had a very easy draw, a little too easy. I've had this in a singles humidor for months at 62 - 65 %RH On lighting it was very harsh. Lots of ammonia. Even for a young cigar like this, it's the most ammonia on the nose I've had from any new cigar I can remember. Really fierce. After about an inch it settled down a bit. Now I could get some flavour, some vanilla and pleasant sourness I sometimes like in a cigar. The thing about this size, given it's ring gauge and length, after about 1 inch I feel it's coming to an end and I start thinking about having another cigar. Could be a marketing plan! That said, the second half smoked quite a bit slower and it took me about 70 minutes altogether, I let it go out once, my fault, not the cigar. It burnt very well, I don't think I had to touch it up at all. Overall impression. At the moment, this one at least, far too young. It needed at least another year. Hard to get flavour through the ammonia, and I enjoy fresh cigars. While I like aged cigars too, I'm not the kind who needs 5 years of age on a cigar before I light it. They might have potential, it's hard to tell. I'm not sure what happened this when the best Monte 2s I've had have been fresh (2012) ones. Comparing to a Monte 2 Brian liked it. That might say something..

Community Software by Invision Power Services, Inc.