Recommended Posts

Posted
On 10/1/2025 at 12:01 AM, joeprice28 said:

Raching MON5800A vs. Yohtron 448L (YC-448)

  • Design & build: The Raching looks more premium in person—high-gloss finishes, dual-pane glass, and a luxe cabinet vibe. Yohtron is clean and modern but more utilitarian.
  • Capacity & layout: Raching is the bigger box (≈580 L; ~3,000–4,000 cigars) with more room and nicer drawer/shelf organization. Yohtron is ~448 L (~2,300 cigars).
  • Humidity/temperature system: Raching’s water-cooling + membrane setup is tidy and avoids sponge-type media, which helps keep things cleaner over time; it also includes ammonia-removal. Yohtron offers precise climate control and an ammonia-removal/water-recycle system, but uses a straightforward water-tank approach.
  • Price: Typical street pricing puts Raching around $4,799, while the Yohtron commonly sells around $3,100–$3,700—often $1,000+ less than the Raching.

Bottom line:

  • Pick Raching if you want the better-looking showpiece with more space, excellent drawers, and a cleaner, low-maintenance hydration system. It’s the superior unit—just pricier.
  • Pick Yohtron if you want a capable, well-featured cabinet that still holds a ton of cigars, maintains stable conditions, and saves you over a grand. It’s a great value play.

For what it's worth, the specs indicate that the Raching MON series has a tighter precision tolerance at +/- 1% RH, versus Yohtron at +/- 2% RH, so perhaps it also drives the price up a bit. Either way, they both seem like great units.

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

A friend of mine has the Yohtron unit. It has served him well. He has no complaints. I love my Raching as well.  

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Community Software by Invision Power Services, Inc.