Popular Post saltbox Posted October 31, 2022 Popular Post Posted October 31, 2022 First time trying one of these myself, though I've already had my wife try one. So far I've only tried the Panatela Extras, so eager to see how long filler from the marca compares. First third: Opens with creamy chocolate and cinnamon spice. Just like the Panatela Extra, it reminds me of Montecristo but with a nice rustic, spice edge to it. Middle third: Creamy earth, cocoa, cinnamon. The chocolate is a darker, earthier chocolate than I get from Montes but excellent in a different way. Last third: The earthiness picks up some strength, but otherwise more of the same enjoyable flavor profile. Overall: Nice and tasty. Compared to the Panatela Extra, the profile felt a bit more complex and differentiated from Montecristo's flavor profile to me. 89/100, and looking forward to trying the PCs I have on the way. 11
jimjim Posted October 31, 2022 Posted October 31, 2022 I get the same Montecristo ish flavors. Back when No 5's were not as good, these took their place for me.
saltbox Posted October 31, 2022 Author Posted October 31, 2022 I'm curious to see if I'm able to differentiate between the two in a blind tasting. Maybe throw in a Siglo I as a curveball.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now