Recommended Posts

Posted

I thought I would revisit one of the first ELs  as it fit the call for Montes.  If I recall the feedback on these over the years they were inconsistent.  So I invited a fellow smoker to double check my impressions.

93D89CAC-9B1E-43B7-8933-7D9685CE53B3.jpeg.da0aefe62a84cb7cc1da34d9874a28c5.jpeg

Pre-light:  darker wrappers typical if the early ELs and thick.  Construction good and prelight aroma was a toasted tobacco.

AD3D516D-DD41-4DA0-A255-676064F2BB3D.jpeg.fe4adc5b34f5dabf6d0f0dd85aa052e4.jpeg
First Third: first puff was a blast of Monte herbal; vet nice.  This though past quickly turning to a sharp unpleasantness.  The burn was uneven. I would rate it at this point an 82.

D8708069-E85E-4B59-A02C-BAD61B22AB88.jpeg.f23ffacd811338b8003d370025d98dc0.jpeg

Second Third:  the middle was the best, interesting aged tea, a wheat bread, biscuit—- interesting aged tobacco, albeit mild in intensity.  If this was the whole cigar it would rate an 88.  My mate even got a note of carmel. His burned even.  Mine wonky.

Last Third: well it back to sharpness.  The flavors are gone. My mate agreed it went “air bomb” in his words.Overall:  My burn had to be Retouched 5 or 6 times.  Wrapper was fire retardant.  My colleague’s though, burned well.  He had a better sample flavor-wise also, more tea.  Rating is 84.

0DA4C463-1758-4B0A-99BE-D88C4D304384.jpeg

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Community Software by Invision Power Services, Inc.